首页|技术重塑治理关系与数字治理"内卷化"——以"12345"热线驱动市域治理为例

技术重塑治理关系与数字治理"内卷化"——以"12345"热线驱动市域治理为例

扫码查看
目前,推动来自数据资源的技术驱动与政府行政体系融合,已成为推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的应有之义.数字治理对民众和政府具有双向赋能意义,但需要有效协同数字技术与科层体制之间的关系、平衡多元治理主体之间的关系,避免陷入数字治理"内卷化"的困境.以A市"12345"热线驱动市域治理为例,数字治理的"内卷化"生发于数字信息在行政体制内运行的不同阶段.在诉求信息输入阶段,信息传播的跨时空性使群众从逐级传递变为直接面对上级政府,上级政府实现对诉求处理全流程的监督和考核,形塑了去中间化治理主体关系,导致治理内容、数量和成本不断增长,同时基层政府自主治理的空间减少.在诉求信息筛选阶段,现实诉求以简化和标准化的信息形式在热线数字系统中闭环流转,治理实践中诉求解决的情境关系出现脱域.原先可以在治理情境中被识别的不合理诉求和反复提交的诉求,伪装成单一诉求从而突破原有治理结构的抑制,挤占了大量的治理注意力和治理资源,破坏原有的治理传统与治理规则,造成"无理"诉求工单在热线系统中的空转.在诉求信息处理或执行阶段,受到科层压力与信息传递的乘数效应影响,诉求治理的责任关系发生改变,基层组织由于压力过载产生目标替代行为.数字治理"内卷化"是数字技术逻辑对治理逻辑与治理关系的改造,使数字技术从辅助治理的工具手段转变为主导基层工作的关键变量.数字技术对治理的反噬后果,不仅表现为治理效能的低效增长,还体现在工具理性思维对人本思维的侵蚀与替代.破解数字治理的"内卷化"问题,需要审视数字技术引发的治理关系变革,发挥数字信息在治理体系与治理能力现代化中的支撑作用,在市域层面重点发挥数据挖掘的决策辅助功能,厘清各个治理主体关系责权利边界,避免数字化的过度监督.数字治理要辅助场景式治理,重点激发基层组织和群众的主体性.
Technology Reshaping Governance Relationship and Digital Governance"Involution"——Taking"12345"Hotline Driving City Governance as an Example
At present,promoting the integration of technology-driven from data resources and govern-ment administrative system has become the proper meaning of promoting the modernization of national gov-ernance system and governance capacity.Digital governance has a two-way enabling significance for the people and the government,but it needs to effectively coordinate the relationship between digital technology and bureaucratic system,balance the relationship between multiple governance subjects,and avoid falling into the dilemma of"involution"of digital governance.Taking the"12345"hotline in a city as an exam-ple,the"involution"of digital governance occurs at different stages of the operation of digital information in the administrative system.In the input stage of appeal information,the cross-space-time nature of infor-mation dissemination makes the masses change from step-by-step transmission to directly facing the upper government,and the higher government realizes the supervision and assessment of the whole process of ap-peal processing,which shapes the relationship between the main bodies of de-intermediation governance,resulting in the continuous growth of governance content,quantity and cost,while the space for independ-ent governance of grass-roots governments is reduced.In the stage of appeal information screening,realistic appeals circulate in the hotline digital system in the form of simplified and standardized information,and the situational relationship of appeal resolution in governance practice is out of domain.Unreasonable ap-peals and repeated appeals that can be identified in the governance situation are disguised as single ap-peals,thus breaking through the restraint of the original governance structure,occupying a large number of governance attention and resources,destroying the original governance tradition and rules,and causing the idling of"unreasonable"appeal work orders in the hotline system.In the stage of information processing or execution,the responsibility relationship of appeal governance has changed due to the multiplier effect of bureaucratic pressure and information transmission,and grass-roots organizations have target substitution behavior due to pressure overload.The"involution"of digital governance is the transformation of the rela-tionship between governance logic and governance by the logic of digital technology,which makes digital technology change from a tool to assist governance to a key variable to dominate grass-roots work.The con-sequences of digital technology on governance are not only the inefficient growth of governance effective-ness,but also the erosion and substitution of instrumental rational thinking on humanistic thinking.To solve the problem of"involution"of digital governance,we need to examine the change of governance relations caused by digital technology,give full play to the supporting role of digital information in the modernization of governance system and governance capacity,focus on the decision-making assistant function of data mining at the municipal level,clarify the boundaries of responsibilities,rights and interests of various gov-ernance subjects,and avoid excessive supervision of digitalization.Digital governance should assist scenario-based governance and stimulate the subjectivity of grass-roots organizations and the masses.

digital governancemunicipal governanceinvolution"12345"hotline

陈锋、王泽林

展开 >

北京工业大学 北京社会管理研究基地,北京 100124

中央民族大学 民族学与社会学学院,北京 100081

数字治理 市域治理 内卷化 "12345"热线

国家社会科学基金

19BSH024

2024

探索
中共重庆市委党校

探索

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.851
ISSN:1007-5194
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 1
  • 14