摘要
政治学是一门致力于实现善政良治的社会科学.构建中国政治学自主知识体系,是打破西方理论话语垄断、精准阐释中国政治实践规律、增强中国政治话语权与文化软实力、为人类政治文明进步提供中国智慧的关键之举.构建中国政治学自主知识体系是一个系统工程,涉及中国政治学的本体论、知识论和方法论等多个层面.陈军亚教授认为,西方社会科学所谓的"进步逻辑"将中国经验置于他者化地位,遮蔽了中国本土实践的主体性.因此,需要通过知识生产逻辑、共识构建逻辑和知识传播逻辑重构中国政治学知识体系的自主性命题,平衡规范研究与实证研究、政策解释与理论原创、宏大叙事与微观研究的关系,以实践为基础实现理论创新,推动形成多元共生的世界知识格局.孟天广教授以本土化与国际化的张力与互构为分析主轴,梳理中国政治学的学科建制演进与知识生产路径,探讨其在学术体系、公共价值与物质基础三重维度下的发展逻辑,揭示其正面临研究力量与目录压缩、政策需求与理论原创、范式引进与话语转化之间的三重结构性失衡,并提出未来可能的理论生长路径与学术范式的转型方向.庞金友教授认为,中国政治学自主知识体系构建需要处理好五大关系:理论与实践的双向构建、一般与特殊的辩证统一、传统与现代的创造性转化、中国与西方的主体性对话、实然与应然的互动升华.他认为,中国政治学自主知识体系构建本质上是历史逻辑、实践逻辑与理论逻辑的统一,旨在实现从依附性解释到主体性构建的范式革新.宋雄伟教授以中国共产党为考察中心,探讨如何在开放思维中构建中国政治学自主知识体系.他指出,开放性是构建中国政治学自主知识体系的重要方法论,阐述党在开放思维中创新指导思想、形塑主体性概念、增强实践自觉,形成"入乎其内""出乎其外"的体系,强调需突破困境,实现多重升华,为人类政治文明贡献中国智慧.方盛举教授认为,边疆政治关系的复杂性、边疆发展和安全问题的突出性、推进边疆治理体系和治理能力现代化的迫切性、全过程人民民主全面嵌融边疆政治体系的战略性等,都要求构建边疆政治学自主知识体系.党和政府对边疆治理工作的高度重视,从古至今我国边疆治理实践成果和理论成果的博大丰富,为边疆政治学自主知识体系的构建提供了可能.构建边疆政治学自主知识体系要从边疆政治关系、边疆治理制度政策、边疆政治文化、边疆政治发展、领土、国界等重点议题入手.刘训练教授以政治文化概念为例,探讨中国自主知识体系构建中的文化自觉与政治自觉.他指出,中国学者对西方政治文化概念进行了改造,超越其二元对立,实现跨学科实践与本土化创新.使用外来概念需准确认知其历史、辨析中西语境差异、考虑适用性,以推动自主知识体系构建,为人类政治文明贡献力量.马雪松教授聚焦中国政治学标识性概念,探讨其作为自主知识体系构建基础的重要性.他认为,标识性概念具有指称对象典型性、内涵意义深刻性等特性,当前存在供需总量不足与结构性失衡的张力,需要从传统政治文化转化发展、现实政治实践概括、国外成果批判借鉴等路径生成标识性概念,为自主知识体系构建提供支持.
Abstract
Political science is a social science dedicated to achieving good governance and sound ad-ministration.Constructing an autonomous knowledge system of Chinese political science is crucial for breaking the monopoly of Western theoretical discourse,accurately interpreting the laws of China's politi-cal practice,enhancing China's political discourse power,and providing Chinese wisdom for the progress of human political civilization.This construction is a systematic project involving multiple dimensions such as the ontology,epistemology,and methodology of Chinese political science.Professor Chen Junya argues that the"progressive logic"of Western social sciences positions Chinese experience as the"other",obscu-ring the subjectivity of local practices in China.To reconstruct the autonomy proposition of China's politi-cal science knowledge system,it is necessary to address the logics of knowledge production,consensus building,and knowledge dissemination.Balancing the relationships between normative and empirical re-search,policy interpretation and theoretical originality,and grand narratives and micro-level studies is es-sential.Theoretical innovation should be grounded in practice to promote a pluralistic and symbiotic global knowledge landscape.Professor Meng Tianguang takes the tension and mutual construction between locali-zation and internationalization as the analytical axis.He examines the evolution of China's political science as a discipline and its knowledge production pathways,exploring its developmental logic across three di-mensions:academic systems,public values,and material foundations.He reveals the structural imbal-ances between research capacity and disciplinary compression,policy demands and theoretical originality,and paradigm introduction and discourse transformation.He also proposes potential future pathways for the-oretical growth and transformations in academic paradigms.Professor Pang Jinyou contends that construc-ting an autonomous knowledge system for Chinese political science requires addressing five key relation-ships:the bidirectional construction of theory and practice,the dialectical unity of the general and the spe-cific,the creative transformation of tradition and modernity,the subjective dialogue between China and the West,and the interactive sublimation of the actual and the ideal.He asserts that the construction is funda-mentally a unification of historical,practical,and theoretical logic,aimed at shifting from dependent inter-pretation to autonomous construction.Professor Song Xiongwei,focusing on the CPC,explores how to con-struct an autonomous knowledge system for Chinese political science with an open mindset.He emphasizes that openness is a vital methodology,detailing how the Party innovates guiding ideologies,shapes subjec-tive concepts,and enhances practical consciousness within this openness.This approach forms a system that is both"internally grounded"and"externally oriented",stressing the need to overcome challenges and achieve multiple advancements to contribute Chinese wisdom to human political civilization.Professor Fang Shengju highlights that the complexity of borderland political relations,the prominence of borderland development and security issues,the urgency of modernizing borderland governance systems and capaci-ties,and the strategic integration of whole-process people's democracy into borderland political systems necessitate the construction of an autonomous knowledge system for borderland political science.The high priority the Party and government place on borderland governance,coupled with China's rich historical and theoretical achievements in this area,provides a foundation for such construction.Key topics include bor-derland political relations,governance systems and policies,political culture,political development,terri-tory,and national boundaries.Professor Liu Xunlian,using the concept of political culture as a case stud-y,examines cultural and political consciousness in constructing China's autonomous knowledge system.He notes that Chinese scholars have adapted Western concepts of political culture,transcended their binary oppositions,and achieved interdisciplinary practice and localized innovation.When using foreign concepts,it is essential to understand their history accurately,discern differences in Sino-Western contexts,and con-sider their applicability to advance the construction of an autonomous knowledge system and contribute to human political civilization.Professor Ma Xuesong focuses on the significance of distinctive concepts in Chinese political science as the foundation for constructing an autonomous knowledge system.He argues that such concepts are characterized by their typical referents and profound connotations.Currently,there is a tension between insufficient supply and structural imbalance.Generating distinctive concepts requires transforming traditional political culture,summarizing real-world political practices,and critically learning from foreign achievements to support the construction of an autonomous knowledge system.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据