Study on the Relationship between Signal-to-Noise Ratio Loss and Electrocochleography in Noise Exposure
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
万方数据
维普
目的 探究噪声暴露者的噪声下信噪比损失(SNR loss)与耳蜗电图的关系及其对隐性听力损失的辅助诊断价值.方法 选取有噪声暴露史的工人41例(41耳),分别进行纯音测听、声导抗、噪声下的言语识别以及耳蜗电图测试,依据噪声下言语识别能力分为两组,A组:SNR loss＜0(19耳),B组:SNR loss≥0(22耳),分析两组耳蜗电图的差异.结果 噪声下言语识别测试结果显示,A、B两组受试者的信噪比损失差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);耳蜗电图结果显示,在96、90、80 dB nHL三个刺激强度下A组AP振幅大于B组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);在96、90、80、70、60 dB nHL五个刺激强度下B组SP振幅大于A组,差异有显著统计学意义(P＜0.001);在96、90、80、70 dB nHL四个刺激强度下,B组SP/AP振幅比大于A组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 信噪比损失＜0与≥0的噪声暴露者耳蜗电图SP/AP振幅比在不同声强下有显著差异.
Objective To investigate the relationship between signal-to-noise ratio loss and electrocochleo-gram in noise exposed subjects and its assistive diagnosis value for hidden hearing loss.Methods Forty-one workers with a history of noise exposure were tested with pure tone audiometry,acoustic immittance,speech recognition un-der noise and electrocochleogram.They were divided into two groups according to their speech recognition ability under noise:Group A:SNR loss＜0(19 ears),Group B:SNR loss＞0(22 ears).The difference of electrocochleo-gram between the two groups was recorded and analyzed.Results The results of speech recognition test showed that there was significant difference in SNR loss between Group A and Group B(P＜0.05).The results of cochlear electrogram showed that the AP amplitudes of the two groups were significantly different at 96,90 and 80 dB nHL(P＜0.05).At 96,90,80,70,60 dB nHL,there were significant differences in SP amplitudes between the two groups(P＜0.001).At 96,90,80 and 70 dB nHL,there was significant difference in SP/AP amplitude ratio be-tween the two groups(P＜0.05).Conclusion There is a significant difference of SP/AP amplitude ratio between subjects with SNR loss of＜0 and＞0 at different sound intensities.
Noise exposureSpeech recognition under noiseElectrocochleographyHidden hearing loss
万方数据
维普
