首页|北斗卫星单系统精密定轨方法对比分析

北斗卫星单系统精密定轨方法对比分析

Comparison and Analysis of BeiDou Satellite Single-system Precise Orbit Determination

扫码查看
提出了联合使用载波相位和相位平滑伪距实现北斗卫星双差动力法精密定轨,给出了北斗卫星非差动力法和双差动力法精密定轨的数据处理流程,分析了两种方法的异同.结合实测数据,对比了两种方法的实际定轨效果,结果表明:一定测站布局下,利用两种方法, GEO(Geostationary Earth Orbit Satellite)卫星3维精密定轨精度均能达到1 m左右量级, IGSO(Inclined Geosynchronous Earth Orbit Satellite)和MEO(Medium Earth Orbit Satellite)卫星优于0.5 m,3类卫星的径向定轨精度均优于10 cm.较之非差动力法,双差动力法对GEO卫星精密定轨精度具有一定的改善作用,两者在IGSO卫星精密定轨上效果基本相当,但在MEO卫星定轨上,非差动力法结果更优.
The method of double-difference dynamic precise orbit determination for BeiDou satellites by using both carrier phase and smoothed pseudo-range is presented. The data processing flows of zero-difference and double-difference dynamic precise orbit determination for BeiDou satellites are presented. And the two methods are analyzed. The precision of two methods is compared based on the real data. The results show that in the condition of stations layout and by using the two methods, the three-dimension precision of GEO (Geostationary Earth Orbit Satellite) can reach about 1 m, and those of IGSO (Inclined Geosynchronous Earth Orbit Satellite) and MEO (Medium Earth Orbit Satellite) can be better than 0.5 m. And the radial precision of the three kinds of orbit satellites can be all better than 10 cm. Compared with the zero-difference dynamic method, the orbit precision of GEO is better with the double-difference dynamic method, and that of IGSO is comparable, but that of MEO is worse.

celestial mechanicsspace vehiclesmethods:data analysis

刘伟平、郝金明、邓科、陈逸伦

展开 >

信息工程大学导航与空天目标工程学院郑州450001

北斗导航应用技术河南省协同创新中心郑州450001

天体力学 航天器 方法:数据分析

2016

天文学报
中国天文学会

天文学报

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.339
ISSN:0001-5245
年,卷(期):2016.57(5)
  • 1
  • 1