首页|久坐及不同运动方案对静态平衡能力的影响

久坐及不同运动方案对静态平衡能力的影响

扫码查看
目的:评定久坐以及核心稳定性练习(CSE)、骨骼肌肥大练习(MHE)、无氧间歇练习(AER)和持续性有氧练习(ANA)对平衡能力的影响,为警校学员精准运动训练提供依据.方法:采用文献资料法、实验法、数理统计法等研究方法,随机选择30 名健康青年男性受试者分别完成6h间歇久坐测试和4 个不同的运动方案后进行平衡能力测试,并记录运动中的心率(HR)、运动后过量氧耗(EPOC)和运动冲量(TRIMP).结果:(1)运动负荷方面,相较安静状态,4 种运动方案运动后HR、EPOC和TRIMP均显著增加(P<0.05).其中,AER和ANA运动方案运动后HR和EPOC显著高于CSE和MHE(P<0.05),ANA运动方案运动后TRIMP显著高于其他3 种运动方案(P<0.05).(2)平衡能力方面,与晨测值相比,久坐后的动摇总轨迹长、X轴动摇轨迹长和最大动摇径以及Y轴重心偏移指标显著增加(P<0.05);4 种运动方案运动后动摇总轨迹长、X轴轨迹长和Y轴轨迹长均显著增加(P<0.05);与久坐相比,4 种运动方案运动后Y轴重心偏移均显著降低(P<0.05).(3)不同运动方案之间,AER和ANA运动方案运动后除动摇角度和重心偏移指标外,其余指标均显著高于CSE和MHE(P<0.05).其中,CSE运动方案运动后Y轴轨迹长、Y轴最大动摇径和单位面积轨迹长均显著高于MHE(P<0.05),ANA运动方案运动后动摇总轨迹和Y轴轨迹长较AER运动方案运动后显著增加(P<0.05).除AER运动方案外,其余运动方案在20 min休息后,平衡能力基本恢复至久坐后的状态.结论:整体上,6 h间歇久坐后,躯干前倾,可对静态平衡能力产生不利的影响;4 个常用运动方案均可用于抵消久坐带来的不利影响,但影响幅度存在不同.
The Impact of Sedentariness and Different Exercise Programs on Static Balance Ability
OBJECTIVE:The study aims to provide a basis for accurate exercise training via evaluating the effects of sedentary life and four kinds of common exercises:core stability exercises(CSE),skeletal muscle hypertrophy exercises(MHE),anaerobic interval exercises(ANA),and continuous aerobic exercises(AER)on balance ability.METHODS:The study employs literature research method,experimentation and mathematical statistics.30 randomly selected healthy young male subjects completed a 6-hour intermittent sedentariness test and four different exercise programs.Then,they underwent a balance test,and their heart rate(HR)in exercise,excess post-exercise oxygen consumption(EPOC)and training impulse(TRIMP)were obtained.RESULTS:(1)Exercise Load:Compared to the resting state,all four exercise protocols led to significant increases in HR,EPOC,and TRIMP(P<0.05).Notably,the AER and ANA protocols resulted in significantly higher HR and EPOC levels than the CSE and MHE protocols(P<0.05).Additionally,TRIMP was significantly higher following the ANA protocol than after the other three protocols(P<0.05).(2)Balance Ability:Compared to the morning measurements,sedentariness resulted in significant increases in total sway path length,X-axis sway path length,maximum sway distance,and Y-axis center of gravity(CoG)deviation(P<0.05).After all four exercise protocols,the total sway path length,X-axis sway path length,and Y-axis sway path length were significantly increased(P<0.05).However,compared to the effects of sedentariness,the Y-axis CoG deviation significantly decreased following all four exercise protocols(P<0.05).(3)Comparison Between Exercise Protocols:After the AER and ANA protocols,all indicators,except for sway angle and CoG deviation,were significantly higher than those observed after the CSE and MHE protocols(P<0.05).Specifically,following the CSE protocol,the Y-axis sway path length,maximum sway distance on the Y-axis,and unit area path length were significantly higher than those observed after the MHE protocol(P<0.05).Moreover,the total sway path length and Y-axis sway path length were significantly greater after the ANA protocol than after the AER protocol(P<0.05).Except for the AER protocol,balance ability largely returned to the post-sitting state after 20 minutes of rest following the other exercise protocols.CONCLUSION:Overall,6 hours of intermittent sitting,coupled with forward trunk inclination,can negatively impact static balance ability.All four commonly used exercise protocols can mitigate the adverse effects of sedentariness,though their effectiveness varies.

sedentarinessstatic balance abilityexercise plancenter of gravity

徐琳、杨刚、王立新、鱼工建、马雁骎、张满忠、王青超

展开 >

江苏省司法警官高等职业学校,江苏 南京 211806

久坐 静态平衡能力 运动方案 重心

第五期江苏省职业教育教学改革研究课题

ZYB502

2024

体育科技文献通报
国家体育总局体育信息中心

体育科技文献通报

影响因子:0.329
ISSN:1005-0256
年,卷(期):2024.32(8)