首页|共聚焦内镜诊断胃肠上皮化生及胃癌的Meta分析

共聚焦内镜诊断胃肠上皮化生及胃癌的Meta分析

扫码查看
目的 运用 Meta分析方法探究共聚焦显微内镜(confocal lasser endomicroscopy,CLE)对胃肠上皮化生(gastrointestinal epi-thelial metaplasia,GIM)及胃癌的诊断价值.方法 系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI、万方、Sinomed数据库,搜集 CLE诊断 GIM 及胃癌的相关文献,搜索时间为建库至 2022 年 10 月,根据评价诊断性试验质量表(QUADAS-2)对纳入文献行质量评价;采用 Review Manager 5.4 和 Stata 15.0 软件行 Meta分析,采用随机效应模型计算合并敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比(posi-tive likelihood ratio,PLR)、阴性似然比(negative likelihood ratio,NLR)、诊断比值比(diagnostic ratio,DOR)及 95%CI,进行 SROC拟合分析,通过 I2 评价由非阈值效应所致的异质性,若存在明显异质性,进一步进行回归分析判断产生异质性来源;采用 Deek's漏斗图和 Fagan图,评估发表偏倚及验前、验后概率.结果 最终 GIM 组中纳入 7 篇文献,胃癌组中纳入 6 篇文献,发现 CLE 诊断 GIM 及胃癌的合并敏感度分别为 0.88 和 0.96,合并特异度分别为 0.93 和 0.94,PLR 分别是 12.43 和 17.34,NLR 分别是 0.13 和 0.04,DOR分别为 98.96 和 416.87,SROC下面积分别为 0.92 和 0.98.Fagan图显示 CLE 诊断胃肠上皮化生时,明确患有该病变的概率为 93%,排除 GIM 时,明确患有该病变的概率为 11%,诊断胃癌时,明确患有该病变的概率为 95%,排除胃癌时,明确患有该病变的概率为 4%.纳入研究间存在较高异质性,经计算各研究间不存在阈值效应及发表偏倚,进一步行回归分析发现GIM 组异质性来源于其他非变量因素,胃癌组异质性较大的原因来源于CLE诊断状态.结论 基于本Meta分析结果发现,CLE对GIM 及胃癌具有较好的诊断价值,可作为临床诊断辅助工具.
Role of confocal microscopic endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal epithelia metaplasia and gastric cancer:a Meta-analysis
Objective To study the diagnostic value of confocal lasser endomicroscopy(CLE)in gastrointestinal ep-ithelial metaplasia(GIM)and gastric cancer by Meta-analysis.Methods The databases of PubMed,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,CNKI,Wanfang Data and Sinomed were searched for related studies published up to Oct.2022,and the quality of the included literatures was evaluated according to QUADAS.The random effect model was used to calcu-late the combined sensitivity,specificity,positive likelihood ratio(PLR),negative likelihood ratio(NLR),diagnostic ratio(DOR)and 95% CI,and the pooled receiver operating characteristic curve(SROC)fitting analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve.Evaluating heterogeneity caused by non-threshold effect by I2,and if there was ob-vious heterogeneity,further judging the source of heterogeneity by regression score;Deek′s funnel diagram and Fagan diagram were used to evaluate the publication bias and the probability before and after the test.Results In the end,7 articles were included in the GIM group and 6 articles were included in the gastric cancer group.There was high hetero-geneity among the included articles,and there was no threshold effect and publication bias.It was found that the sum-marized sensitivity of GIM and gastric cancer for CLE diagnosis were 0.88 and 0.96,the summarized specificity was 0.93 and 0.94,the PLR was 12.43 and 17.34,the NLR was 0.13 and 0.04,the DOR was 98.96 and 416.87,and the area under SROC was 0.92 and 0.98,respectively.Fagan diagram showed that the probability of GIM was 93% when CLE diagnosed GIM,11% when GIM was excluded,95% when gastric cancer was diagnosed,and 4% when gastric cancer was excluded.Meta-regression analysis found that the heterogeneity of GIM group came from other non-variable factors,and the reason for the large heterogeneity of gastric cancer group came from CLE diagnosis state.Conclusion Based on the results of this Meta-analysis,CLE has good diagnostic value for GIM and gastric cancer,and can be used as an auxiliary tool for clinical diagnosis.

Gastric cancerGastrointestinal epithelial metaplasiaConfocal laser endomicroscopyDiagnostic valueMeta-analysis

张记霞、杜飞燕、王子卓、刘家龙、赵秋、刘静

展开 >

武汉大学中南医院消化内科,湖北 武汉 430071

胃癌 胃肠上皮化生 共聚焦内镜 诊断价值 Meta分析

2024

胃肠病学和肝病学杂志
郑州大学

胃肠病学和肝病学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.029
ISSN:1006-5709
年,卷(期):2024.33(10)
  • 9