首页|改良结肠传输试验在慢性便秘分型诊断中的应用价值及临床特征分析

改良结肠传输试验在慢性便秘分型诊断中的应用价值及临床特征分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨慢性便秘患者改良结肠传输试验(colonic transit test,CTT)分型与肛门直肠检查结果及患者临床特点的关系.方法 纳入 189 例慢性便秘患者,记录患者的生活质量量表(patient assessment of constipation quality of life,PAC-QoL)、便秘评分系统量表(constipation scoring system scale,CSS)、Bristol粪便性状量表(Bristol stool form scale,BSFS).根据 72 h后改良 CTT结果将患者分为慢传输型便秘(slow transit constipation,STC)、混合型便秘(mixed constipation,MC)、排便障碍型便秘(defecatory disorder,DD)和正常传输型便秘(normal transit constipation,NTC)四组,同时行肛门直肠测压(anorectal manometry,ARM)和排粪造影检查.比较各分型患者的肛门直肠检查结果、人口学特征和相关调查问卷的关系.结果 共 189 例患者,其中 STC 67 例(35.4%)、DD 19 例(10.1%)、MC39 例(20.6%)和NTC 64 例(33.9%).四组间BMI、CSS评分中大便次数评分和病程评分、BSFS评分、肛门静息压、直肠肛管压力梯度(rectoanal pressure gradient,RAPG)、肛管松弛率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).STC 组 BMI显著高于 NTC 组,病程评分显著高于 DD组,且 BSFS显著小于 NTC组(P<0.05).DD组肛门静息压和肛管松弛率显著低于 STC 组、MC 组和 NTC 组(P<0.05),STC组 RAPG显著低于 NTC组(P<0.05).相关性分析显示,便秘患者结肠 72 h钡剂传输部位与 BMI、CSS评分中大便次数评分呈负相关(r=-0.245,P=0.001;r=-0.185,P=0.011),与 RAPG、BSFS 呈正相关(r=0.257,P=0.003;r=0.224,P=0.002).结论 慢性便秘患者改良 CTT分型与 ARM 结果及患者临床特点相关,其在区分便秘类型,了解便秘病理生理上有一定的价值,在无胃肠动力检测的医疗中心可以初步进行便秘分型诊断并进一步指导治疗.
Application value and clinical characteristics of modified colonic transit test in classi-fication and diagnosis of chronic constipation
Objective To investigate the relationship between modified colonic transit test(CTT)classification and anorectal examination results and clinical characteristics in patients with chronic constipation.Methods A total of 189 patients with chronic constipation were enrolled and the scores of patient assessment of constipation quality of life(PAC-QoL),constipation scoring system scale(CSS),Bristol stool form scale(BSFS)were recorded.The patients were di-vided into four groups according to the results after 72 hours of modified CTT,including slow transit constipation(STC),mixed constipation(MC),defecatory disorder(DD)and normal transit constipation(NTC).Anorectal mano-metry(ARM)and defecography were also performed.The results of anorectal examination,demographic characteristics and related questionnaires were compared among the four groups.Results The 189 patients were classified as STC 67 patients(35.4% ),DD 19 patients(10.1% ),MC 39 patients(20.6% )and NTC 64 patients(33.9% ).BMI,stool frequency and constipation duration in CSS score,BSFS,anal resting pressure,rectoanal pressure gradient(RAPG),and the percentage of anal relaxation had statistical differences among the four groups(P<0.05).BMI in STC group was significantly higher than that in NTC group,the constipation duration score was significantly higher than that in DD group,and BSFS was significantly lower than that in NTC group(P<0.05).Anal resting pressure and the percentage of anal relaxation were significantly lower in DD group than those in STC,MC and NTC groups(P<0.05).RAPG was significantly lower in the STC group than that in the NTC group(P<0.05).Correlation analysis showed a negative cor-relation between BMI,stool frequency score and colonic 72 hours barium transmit site in constipated patients(r=-0.245,P=0.001;r=-0.185,P=0.011).RAPG and BSFS were positively correlated with colonic 72 hours barium transmit site(r=0.257,P=0.003;r=0.224,P=0.002).Conclusion The classification of modified CTT is related to the results of ARM and the clinical characteristics in chronic constipation patients,which has certain value in distin-guishing the subtypes of constipation and understanding the pathophysiology of constipation,and can preliminarily per-form constipation classification diagnosis and further guide treatment in medical centers without gastrointestinal motility testing.

ConstipationModified colonic transit testAnorectal manometryDefecographyGastrointestinal motilityDiagnosis

徐雯丽、秋新松、吴阳、陈超伍、刘军、朱滢

展开 >

西安市第五医院消化科,陕西 西安 710082

大连医科大学扬州临床学院

苏北人民医院消化科

便秘 改良结肠传输试验 肛门直肠测压 排粪造影 胃肠动力 诊断

江苏省中医药科技发展计划面上项目

MS2023138

2024

胃肠病学和肝病学杂志
郑州大学

胃肠病学和肝病学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.029
ISSN:1006-5709
年,卷(期):2024.33(10)
  • 3