首页|扎根理论在体育学研究中的适配议题及理论基础

扎根理论在体育学研究中的适配议题及理论基础

扫码查看
当前,国内体育领域对扎根理论的运用存在静态与去情境化错用、方法与研究议题的适配性阐述不充分以及各流派分歧理解不足等议题错配问题。为澄清造成这些问题的方法论遮蔽,通过回顾扎根理论的方法论成果以及体育领域的经验研究,提出:在将扎根理论作为研究方法之前,研究者需转变研究观念与方法内部的理论基础及其适用范围保持一致,理解支撑扎根理论的建构主义、解释主义观点,明晰其符号互动与实用主义取向,并将之运用于情境化、互动化的体育议题。除此之外,研究者若要正确应用扎根理论,还需在了解其共性知识的基础上,掌握各流派背后方法论差异。由此,研究者方可由内而外地从流派共性与差异层面,理解扎根理论在体育领域的适用议题。
Themes and Theoretical Basis of Grounded Theory in Sports Studies
Presently,limitations exist in applying grounded theory within the domestic sports domain,encompassing static and de-contextualized misapplications,inadequacies in defining the adaptability basis for method selection and research topics,and an insufficient grasp of divergences among various schools of thought.To address these inherent methodological uncertainties,this paper proposes that all social phenomena in sports are suitable for grounded theory.However,before adopting grounded theory as a research method,scholars must realign their research paradigms to ensure coherence with the theory's philosophical basis and its scope within the method's structure.This necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the constructivist and interpretivist viewpoints supporting grounded theory at ontological and epistemological levels.Methodologically,it involves clarifying symbolic interactionism and pragmatic orientations,and applying grounded theory to contextualized,interactive sports topics.Moreover,researchers must discern methodological disparities among diverse schools of thought,grounded in their shared knowledge,to effectively apply grounded theory.Consequently,scholars can grasp the breadth of grounded theory's application in sports science,considering both commonalities and distinctions among these schools of thought.

grounded theorysports studyapplicable scopecommonality and difference

林志义、康益豪、杨海晨

展开 >

福建师范大学体育科学学院,福建福州 350108

扎根理论 体育学 适用范围 共性与差异 适配议题

国家社会科学基金一般项目

23BTY079

2024

武汉体育学院学报
武汉体育学院

武汉体育学院学报

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.384
ISSN:1000-520X
年,卷(期):2024.58(5)
  • 46