物理测试2024,Vol.42Issue(6) :6-9.DOI:10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0777.20240011

相控阵超声检测水浸法与接触法的对比分析

Comparative study of phased array ultrasonic detection of water immersion and contact method

陈积乐 陆进亮 刘熙 梁素华 冯舒婷 关楚
物理测试2024,Vol.42Issue(6) :6-9.DOI:10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0777.20240011

相控阵超声检测水浸法与接触法的对比分析

Comparative study of phased array ultrasonic detection of water immersion and contact method

陈积乐 1陆进亮 1刘熙 1梁素华 1冯舒婷 1关楚1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 广西壮族自治区特种设备检验研究院,广西南宁 530000
  • 折叠

摘要

相控阵超声检测技术在实际应用过程中,探头与工件的耦合方式主要有接触法与水浸法.接触法检测中探头与工件直接接触,检测效果受到工件表面粗糙度与近场区的影响;而水浸法检测中探头与工件之间存在水层,不仅耦合效果好,还无近场区的影响,检测效果好.通过分析两种检测方法的缺陷成像特点,对比试验验证相同缺陷的成像效果,表明相控阵超声检测法中水浸法相对于接触法具有更好的缺陷显示效果和更高的信噪比.

Abstract

In the practical application of phased array ultrasonic testing technology,the coupling methods of probe and workpieces mainly include contact method and water immersion method.In the contact detection method,the probe is in di-rect contact with the workpiece,and the detection effect is affected by the workpiece surface roughness and near field re-gion.For the water immersion method,there is a water layer between the probe and the workpiece,which not only has good coupling effect,but also has no near-field influence,so the detection effect is good.This paper analyzed the defect imaging characteristics of the two detection methods,and verified the imaging effect of the same defect through comparative experi-ments.It showed that the water immersion method of phased array ultrasonic detection had better defect display effect and higher signal-to-noise ratio than the contact method.

关键词

相控阵超声检测/水浸法/接触法/缺陷检测/近场区

Key words

phased array ultrasonic detection/water immersion method/contact method/defect detection/near field area

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
物理测试
中国钢研科技集团有限公司

物理测试

影响因子:0.363
ISSN:1001-0777
段落导航相关论文