首页|石墨炉原子吸收法与原子荧光法测定水中硒的比较

石墨炉原子吸收法与原子荧光法测定水中硒的比较

Comparison between GFAAS and AFS for the Determination of Se in Water

扫码查看
分别用石墨炉原子吸收法和原子荧光法测定水中微量硒,比较两种方法测定硒元素的优劣, 实验结果表明, 两种方法都具有较好的线性和加标回收率,方法的精密度和准确度无显著性差异,但各有优缺点.石墨炉原子吸收法检出限高,分析速度慢,通常适合硒浓度较高样品的测定; 原子荧光法的检出限低,分析速度快,通常适合水中痕量硒的测定.
Se in water was determined by GFAAS and AFS. The results show that both methods have good linearity and recovery rate,also have no obvious difference,in detection limits, precision and accuracy but each have its advantages and disadvantages. The detection of GFAAS is high and the analysis is slow, usually is suitable for the determination of Se concentrations higher samples; The detection of AFS is low and the analysis speed is fast, which is usually suitable for determination of trace Se in water.

graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometryatomic flourescencespectrometryselenium

陈京京

展开 >

盐城市大丰区环境监测站, 江苏 盐城 224100

石墨炉原子吸收法 原子荧光法

2018

污染防治技术
中国环境科学学会 江苏省环境科学学会

污染防治技术

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2018.31(2)
  • 1
  • 1