首页|不同调查天数24小时膳食回顾法估计人群膳食摄入量

不同调查天数24小时膳食回顾法估计人群膳食摄入量

扫码查看
目的 比较连续3天24小时膳食回顾法(三天法)和连续2天24小时膳食回顾法(两天法)估计食物、能量及营养素摄入量的差异。方法 采用目的抽样在浙江和山西省选择调查对象,通过连续3天24小时膳食回顾调查获得膳食数据,分别计算周四至周六(3天)和周五至周六(2天)的食物和营养素平均摄入量。以三天法为参考标准,比对与评价两种方法在估计食物和营养素摄入量的差异。结果 778名18~60岁调查对象中,与三天法比较,两天法估计的主食、鱼蛋奶豆、蔬菜水果和禽畜肉类食物摄入量均值误差和中位数误差均小于6%,等效性均有统计学意义(P<0。025),且差异均无统计学意义。两天法估计的24个食物组中,17个均值误差在5%以内,误差最小的为水果(0。15%),最大的为动物内脏(13。45%);6个食物组等效性有统计学意义(P<0。025),且差异无统计学意义。在营养素摄入量方面,能量的均值误差和中位数误差均小于0。5%,等效性有统计学意义(P<0。025),且差异无统计学意义。25种营养素中除钠、碘和维生素E外,其他22种营养素的均值误差和中位数误差小于5%,其中16种营养素等效性有统计学意义(P<0。025),且差异均无统计学意义。结论 两种调查方法在群体水平上评估高消费率食物、能量和部分营养素摄入量时差异较小,两天法可以替代三天法收集中国成人人群消费率较高的膳食数据。
Comparison study of food,energy and nutrient intake by 24-hour dietary recall method on two consecutive days versus three consecutive days
OBJECTIVE To compare the differences in estimated food,energy,and nutrient intakes between the consecutive 3 days 24-hour dietary recall(24HR)(referred to as the 3-day method)and consecutive 2 days 24HR(referred to as the 2-day method)to provide a basis for the use of consecutive 2 days 24HR in China nutrition surveillance.METHODS Using objective sampling to select participants in northern and southern provinces,dietary data were obtained through consecutive 3 days 24HR,and the average intakes of food,energy and nutrients were calculated for three days from Thursday to Saturday and two days on Friday and Saturday,respectively.The 3-day method was considered as the reference standard method to evaluate the performance of the 2-day method for estimating food,energy and nutrient intakes.RESULTS Among 778 participants aged 18-60 years in urban and rural areas of two provinces,the errors of the mean and median of 2-day method for estimating the intake of four major food categories less than 6%compared with the 3-day method,and there were significant equivalencies(P<0.025)and no significant differences in four major food categories group(P>0.05).Of the 24 food groups estimated by the 2-day method,17 had mean errors within 5%,the largest error was in animal offal(13.45%)and the smallest in fruit(0.15%),and there were significant equivalencies(P<0.025)and no significant differences in seven food groups(P>0.05).For energy and nutrients,the mean and median errors of energy were less than 0.5%and there were significant equivalencies(P<0.025)and no significant differences for energy(P>0.05).Among the 25 nutrients,except sodium,iodine and vitamin E,the mean and median errors of the other 22 nutrients were less than 5%,and there were significant equivalencies(P<0.025)and no significant differences in 16 nutrients(P>0.05).CONCLUSION There was little difference between the two survey method in assessing the intake of high consumption frequency foods,energy and most nutrients at group level,the 2-day method can be used as an alternative to the 3-day method to collect dietary intake data with high consumption rates in the population.

24-hour dietary recallfoodenergynutrientserrorequivalence

房红芸、黄坤、郭齐雅、于冬梅、许晓丽、琚腊红、赵丽云

展开 >

中国疾病预防控制中心营养与健康所,国家卫生健康委公共营养与健康重点实验室,北京 100050

中国疾病预防控制中心营养与健康所,北京 100050

24小时膳食回顾 食物 能量 营养素 误差 等效性

国家重点研发计划国家卫生健康委员会医改重大项目

2018YFC1603103

2024

卫生研究
中国疾病预防控制中心

卫生研究

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.761
ISSN:1000-8020
年,卷(期):2024.53(4)