首页|流量劫持罪名认定的困境与纾解——基于数据安全法益的视角

流量劫持罪名认定的困境与纾解——基于数据安全法益的视角

扫码查看
流量劫持不仅会因破坏市场竞争秩序被反不正当竞争法规制,还有可能因参与网络黑灰产业犯罪而落入刑法范畴.基于行为复杂与主体多元的特性,流量劫持的罪名认定存在计算机犯罪与财产犯罪两种典型观点,其背后反映出虚拟财产法益、网络秩序法益与系统安全法益的取舍.基于流量劫持行为过程和应用场景的考量,其本质应为对计算机信息系统或应用程序的数据通信行为加以非法控制,侵害了数据安全法益.破坏计算机信息系统罪所保护的数据安全法益,与流量劫持的侵害法益趋同,具有适用的可行性与必要性;同时需要对数据、应用程序、干扰等入罪要件进行刑法教义学释义.
The dilemma and relief of traffic hijacking offense determination——Based on the perspective of the legal benefits of data security
Traffic hijacking is not only regulated by the anti-unfair competition law for destroying the order of market competition,but also may fall into the scope of criminal law for participating in the crime of network black ash industry.Based on the complexi-ty of the behavior and the characteristics of multiple subjects,there are two typical views on the determination of the crime of traf-fic hijacking,namely,computer crime and property crime,which reflect the trade-offs between the legal benefits of virtual asset,the legal benefits of online order and the legal benefits of system safety.Based on the consideration of the behavioral process and applications of traffic hijacking,its essence shall be to unlawfully control the behavior of application program or data communica-tion of the computerized information system,which infringes on the legal interests of data security.The legal interests of data secu-rity protected by the crime of damaging computer information systems are convergent with those infringed upon by traffic hijacking,and the application is feasible and necessary,at the same time,it is necessary to carry out a jurisprudential interpretation of the elements of incrimination,such as data,application programs and interference.

traffic hijackingdata securitysystem securityinterferenceapplication program

许瀚文

展开 >

甘肃政法大学 涉外法治学院,甘肃 兰州 730070

流量劫持 数据安全 系统安全 干扰 应用程序

2024

网络安全与数据治理
华北计算机系统工程研究所(中国电子信息产业集团有限公司第六研究所)

网络安全与数据治理

影响因子:0.348
ISSN:2097-1788
年,卷(期):2024.43(3)
  • 23