首页|互联网公开数据爬取行为的反不正当竞争规制研究

互联网公开数据爬取行为的反不正当竞争规制研究

扫码查看
关于公开数据爬取的规制路径学界没有达成共识,立法上也没有关于数据的权属规定,司法界亦只能依据《反不正当竞争法》来兜底裁判.但反不正当竞争法在立法与司法上都存在问题,具体而言,一般条款的不确定性导致其极易被滥用,互联网专条也无法适用到公开数据的爬取行为上,司法实践中缺乏统一的裁判标准,赔偿金额也缺乏量化标准.对此,可以从立法和司法两个层面进行完善,以期更好地适用《反不正当竞争法》对互联网公开数据爬取行为予以规制.具体而言,在立法上,增设公开数据不正当竞争的行为类型;在司法上,完善裁判思路和赔偿金额的计算标准.
Research on anti-unfair competition regulation of Internet public data crawling behavior
There is no consensus on the regulatory path of public data crawling in the academic community,and there is no legisla-tion on the ownership of data.The judicial community can only base its judgment on the'Anti-Unfair Competition Law'.However,the anti-unfair competition law has problems in both legislation and judicature.Specifically,the uncertainty of general provisions makes it easy to be abused,and Internet articles cannot be applied to the crawling behavior of public data.There is a lack of uni-form judgment standards in judicial practice,and the amount of compensation also lacks quantitative standards.In this regard,it can be improved from the legislative and judicial levels in order to better apply the'Anti-Unfair Competition Law'to regulate the crawling of Internet public data.Specifically,in terms of legislation,the types of acts of unfair competition in public data should be added;in the judiciary,the referee's thinking and the calculation standard of the amount of compensation should be improved.

open datadata crawlinganti-unfair competition

胡佳泺

展开 >

中国人民公安大学,北京 100038

公开数据 数据爬取 反不正当竞争

2024

网络安全与数据治理
华北计算机系统工程研究所(中国电子信息产业集团有限公司第六研究所)

网络安全与数据治理

影响因子:0.348
ISSN:2097-1788
年,卷(期):2024.43(12)