摘要
在总结语言学语域249个常用学术词组后,发现它们与AFL的差别源于后者包括大量的自然科学语料、偏重于FTW、在同义词词组选择上有不同的偏好.在语言学语域内部,词典比教材更接近AFL,更多地指向背景的抽象框架属性、偏重于时空指示、多用同位结构、突出对信息本身的呈现、通过联想拓宽知识面、呈现给读者更多的学术资源而不是总结差异、更多地使用被动结构、不挑明较深层的因果关系而是由读者自己去领悟和发现.
Abstract
The concluding of 249 academic phrases in the register of linguistics reveals that they differ from AFL in that the latter used too much data from natural sciences,biases toward TWL,have different choices in synonyms.Within the register of linguistics,dictionaries,as a contrast with textbooks,have more in common with AFL in embodying the features of academic styles,associate more closely with ground-related intangible frame features and temporal-spatial deictics,use more appositive structures,empha-size the presentation of information proper,broaden the knowledge scope through association,provide more academic resources rather than summarize the differences,use more passive structures,leave intact the possible causal relationships and reserve them to be probed and discovered by the readers.
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据