首页|风险与伦理的叠加抽象:基因编辑刑事治理中的尊严危机反思

风险与伦理的叠加抽象:基因编辑刑事治理中的尊严危机反思

扫码查看
基因编辑行为在伦理上的入罪依据主要体现为对人之尊严的挑战,而尊严内涵的模糊和风险社会视域下的预防理念使得法益面临"叠加抽象".尊严的价值应当以互惠性证成模式动态定义,在系争问题上具体表现为未知的道德滑坡危机和可预测的主体性、歧视性危机.道德滑坡危机不属于刑法意义上的危险,而是现代社会固有的风险;有鉴于风险刑法论证的内在缺陷和利益衡量下的优位结果,主体性、歧视性危机当属刑法意义上被允许的危险.伦理风险无法成为基因编辑行为的入罪依据,新罪法益的界定应回归安全风险范畴.突破伦理障碍并非对新罪设立必要性的否定,而是期待在安全性风险可控的情形下采取较为宽缓的态度,避免伦理争议过分阻滞技术发展.
Superimposed abstraction of risk and ethics:reflections on the dignity crisis in the criminal governance of gene editing
The ethical criminalization basis of gene editing behavior is mainly embodied in the challenge to human dignity,and the fuzzy connotation of dignity and the prevention concept from the perspective of risk society make legal interests face"superposition abstraction".The value of dignity should be defined dynamically by the pattern of reciprocity,which is manifested as the unknown moral decline crisis and the predictable crisis of subjectivity and discrimination.Moral decline crisis is not a danger in criminal law,but an inherent risk in modern society.In view of the inherent defects in the argument of risk criminal law and the superior result of interest measurement,the subjective and discriminatory crisis should be the permissible danger in the meaning of criminal law.It is unreasonable to take the crisis of dignity as the ethical basis for criminalizing gene editing behavior.To break through ethical barriers is not to deny the necessity of establishing new crimes,but to take a relatively lenient attitude in the case of controllable security risks,so as to avoid excessive ethical disputes blocking the development of technology.

risk societygene editingdignityreciprocity certificationpermissible danger

赵书霖

展开 >

中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京 100088

风险社会 基因编辑 尊严 互惠性证成 允许的危险

2024

西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)
西安电子科技大学

西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.35
ISSN:1008-472X
年,卷(期):2024.34(1)
  • 32