首页|中医药商标司法保护多维审视与实践路径探究——以106个裁判案例为研究对象

中医药商标司法保护多维审视与实践路径探究——以106个裁判案例为研究对象

扫码查看
中医药商标不仅是企业商誉的象征,也是消费者识别和选择中医药产品与服务的重要依据.目前的学术研究,缺少从司法实践的角度探讨中医药商标的保护.从中国裁判文书网选取2020至2024年共106个中医药商标纠纷案件进行实证分析,发现司法案例的数量与当地的中医药商标数量并不呈正相关,纠纷案件主要集中在民事一审;案由包括侵害中医药商标权纠纷、不正当竞争等,涉案主体有云南白药、德仁堂等;案件争议焦点主要有涉案商品类别是否相同或类似、涉案商标是否为商标性使用、涉案商标是否属于驰名商标.中医药商标司法保护存在的问题主要是侵权认定、证据收集和举证困难,侵权赔偿数额认定困难,判赔数额偏低.对此提出企业在前端应当加强商标设计,司法机关在后端应当加强法律规范和司法的适用,加大惩罚性赔偿力度的相关措施.
A Multidimensional Examination and an Exploration of Practical Paths for the Judicial Protection of Traditional Chinese Medicine Trademarks—Taking 106 Judged Cases as the Research Objects
Traditional Chinese medicine trademarks are not only a symbol of corporate goodwill but also an important basis for consum-ers to identify and choose traditional Chinese medicine products and services.Current academic research lacks discussion on the protection of traditional Chinese medicine trademarks from the perspective of judicial practice.A total of 106 traditional Chinese medicine trademark dispute cases from 2020 to 2024 were selected from the China Judgments Online for empirical analysis,and it was found that the number of judicial cases is not positively correlated with the number of local traditional Chinese medicine trademarks,and dispute cases are mainly concentrated in the first-instance civil trials.The causes of action include disputes over infringement of traditional Chinese medicine trade-mark rights,unfair competition,etc,and the involved entities include Yunnan Baiyao,Derentang,etc.The main focuses of disputes in the cases are whether the categories of the involved goods are the same or similar,whether the involved trademarks are used in a trade-mark-like manner,and whether the involved trademarks are well-known trademarks.The main problems in the judicial protection of tradi-tional Chinese medicine trademarks are difficulties in infringement determination,collecting evidence and providing proof,as well as diffi-culties in determining the amount of compensation for infringement,and the amount of compensation awarded is relatively low.In this re-gard,relevant measures are proposed,that is,enterprises should strengthen trademark design at the front end,and judicial organs should strengthen the application of legal norms and judicature at the back end and increase the intensity of punitive compensation.

traditional Chinese medicine trademarksjudicial protectioninfringement determinationempirical research

唐青、唐香、胡宇航

展开 >

井冈山大学政法学院,吉安 343009

江西省鹰潭市妇幼保健院,鹰潭 335000

中医药商标 司法保护 侵权认定 实证研究

2025

西部学刊

西部学刊

影响因子:0.132
ISSN:
年,卷(期):2025.(1)