首页|80例剖宫产患者临床分析

80例剖宫产患者临床分析

扫码查看
目的:探讨分析80例剖宫产患者临床治疗效果。方法选取我院2013年5月至2014年5月生产的孕妇80例,随机分为观察组与对照组,各40例。观察组患者给予新式剖宫产术,对照组患者给予传统剖宫产术,观察对比两组患者的手术时间、胎儿取出时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间。结果观察组患者手术时间、胎儿取出时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间均要少于对照组,对比差异明显(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论腹膜外剖宫产术的临床效果优于腹膜内剖宫产术,具有安全、可靠的特点,是一种值得在临床中推广应用的手术方法。
Objective:To investigate the analysis of 80 cases of cesarean section patients with clinical therapeutic effect. Methods:selected in our hospital in 2013 May to 2014 May production of 80 cases of pregnant women, were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each of 40 cases. The patients in the observation group were given cesarean section, the control group were treated with traditional cesarean sec-tion. The operation time, the fetus were observed in the two groups of patients out of time, amount of bleeding, anal exhaust time. Results:the patients in the observation group operation time, fetus extraction time, amount of bleeding, anal exhaust time were less than that in the control group, the difference contrast significantly (P&lt;0.05), with statistical significance. Conclusion:extraperitoneal cesarean section of the clinical ef-fect is better than that of intraperitoneal cesarean section, has the characteristics of safe and reliable, it is worth popularizing and applying in clinical surgery method.

cesarean sectiontraditional cesarean section

盖学辉

展开 >

宁津妇幼保健院妇产科,山东 德州 253024

新式剖宫产术 传统剖宫产术 剖宫产

2015

现代妇女(医学前沿)

现代妇女(医学前沿)

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2015.(1)
  • 3