中华现代护理杂志2024,Vol.30Issue(5) :597-603.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20230707-02687

基于疾病应对机制的转移性前列腺癌住院患者反刍性沉思现状及影响因素分析

Current status and influencing factors of rumination in inpatients with metastatic prostate cancer based on the disease coping mechanism

沈丹菁 刘永珍 金逸 贺徐琳 王泽凤 姚旭东 宋瑞梅
中华现代护理杂志2024,Vol.30Issue(5) :597-603.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20230707-02687

基于疾病应对机制的转移性前列腺癌住院患者反刍性沉思现状及影响因素分析

Current status and influencing factors of rumination in inpatients with metastatic prostate cancer based on the disease coping mechanism

沈丹菁 1刘永珍 1金逸 2贺徐琳 3王泽凤 1姚旭东 1宋瑞梅4
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 同济大学附属第十人民医院泌尿外科,上海 200072
  • 2. 同济大学附属第十人民医院门急诊办公室,上海 200072
  • 3. 同济大学附属第十人民医院腹痛中心,上海 200072
  • 4. 同济大学附属第十人民医院肝胆外科,上海 200072
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探讨疾病应对机制下,转移性前列腺癌(mPCa)住院患者反刍性沉思水平的现状,并对其影响因素进行分析.方法 采用便利抽样法,选取2021年3月—2022年12月在同济大学附属第十人民医院接受治疗的267例mPCa住院患者为研究对象.采用一般资料调查表、事件相关反刍性沉思问卷(C-ERRI)、医学应对方式问卷(MCMQ)、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和社会支持评定量表(SSRS)进行调查,并分析患者反刍性沉思水平的影响因素.结果 本研究回收有效问卷260份,有效回收率为97.4%(260/267).260例mPCa患者反刍性沉思总评分为(31.08±6.46)分,其中侵入性反刍性沉思得分和目的性反刍性沉思得分分别为(14.13±4.44)、(16.95±4.55)分.初次前列腺特异性抗原指标、面对医学应对方式是mPCa患者侵入性反刍性沉思的影响因素(P<0.05);初次前列腺特异性抗原指标、病程时间、社会支持水平和面对医学应对方式是mPCa患者目的性反刍性沉思水平的影响因素(P<0.05).结论 mPCa患者反刍性沉思得分处于中等偏上水平,在疾病应对机制的中介作用下,受多种因素的影响.临床医务人员应结合mPCa患者的临床实际情况和特征,尽早为患者提供个体化的干预措施,协助患者提升积极、正向的认知加工水平能力.

Abstract

Objective To explore the current status of rumination in inpatients with metastatic prostate cancer(mPCa)under the disease coping mechanism,and analyzing its influencing factors.Methods From March 2021 to December 2022,267 mPCa inpatients at the Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University were selected as the study subject using convenience sampling.The survey was conducted using the General Information Questionnaire,Chinese Version of Event Relate Rumination Inventory(C-ERI),Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire(MCMQ),International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS),and Social Support Revalued Scale(SSRS),and the factors influencing the rumination in patients were analyzed.Results This study collected 260 valid questionnaires,with an effective response rate of 97.4%(260/267).The total score of rumination in 260 mPCa patients was(31.08±6.46),with invasive rumination and purposeful rumination scores of(14.13±4.44)and(16.95±4.55),respectively.The initial prostate-specific antigen index,confrontation medical coping modes were the influencing factors of invasive rumination in mPCa patients(P<0.05).The initial prostate-specific antigen index,course of disease,social support,and confrontation medical coping style were the influencing factors of purposeful rumination in mPCa patients(P<0.05).Conclusions The rumination of mPCa patients is above the medium level,and is influenced by multiple factors under the disease coping mechanism.Clinical medical and nursing staff should combine the clinical situation and characteristics of mPCa patients,provide personalized interventions as early as possible,and assist patients in improving their positive cognitive processing abilities.

关键词

前列腺肿瘤/反刍性沉思/医学应对方式/影响因素/横断面调查

Key words

Prostatic neoplasms/Rumination/Medical coping mode/Influencing factors/Cross-sectional studies

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家重点研发计划主动健康和老龄化科技应对重点专项基金(2021YFC2009301)

出版年

2024
中华现代护理杂志
中华医学会

中华现代护理杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.14
ISSN:1674-2907
参考文献量34
段落导航相关论文