目的 汉化癌症患者睡眠信念与态度量表（C-DBAS-14）并检验其信效度。 方法 依据Brislin翻译模型对韩文版C-DBAS-14进行翻译、回译及文化调适，形成中文版C-DBAS-14。采用便利抽样法，选取2022年10月—2023年5月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院住院的361例癌症患者为研究对象，采用一般资料调查表、中文版C-DBAS-14、失眠严重程度指数量表、医院焦虑抑郁量表对患者进行调查，以评价量表的信效度。量表的项目分析采用相关系数法及临界比值法；采用结构效度、内容效度及聚合效度评价量表的效度；采用Cronbach's α系数和组内相关系数评价量表的信度。 结果 本研究共发放问卷361份，回收有效问卷356份，问卷有效回收率为98.6%（356/361）。中文版C-DBAS-14包含4个维度，共14个条目。量表水平的内容效度指数为0.976，条目水平的内容效度指数为0.833～1.000。探索性因子分析共提取出4个公因子，解释总方差的78.8%。验证性因子分析显示，卡方自由度比为1.286，比较拟合指数为0.991，拟合优度指数为0.945，递增拟合指数为0.991，非规准适配指数为0.988，近似误差均方根为0.036。量表总的Cronbach's α系数为0.874、组内相关系数为0.863。量表得分与失眠严重程度指数得分、医院焦虑抑郁量表得分均呈负相关（r值分别为-0.734、-0.639，P<0.01）。 结论 中文版C-DBAS-14具有良好的信度和效度，可作为我国癌症患者不合理睡眠信念的评估工具。 Objective To translate the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale for Cancer Patients (C-DBAS-14) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity. Methods The Korean version of C-DBAS-14 was translated, back-translated, and culturally adapted into Chinese based on Brislin's translation model, forming the Chinese version of C-DBAS-14. From October 2022 to May 2023, 361 hospitalized cancer patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were selected as research objects by convenient sampling method. They were surveyed using a general information questionnaire, the Chinese version of C-DBAS-14, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. The scale's item analysis was based on correlation coefficients and critical ratio values structural validity, content validity, and convergent validity were used to evaluate the scale's validity Cronbach's α coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to assess its reliability. Results A total of 361 questionnaires were distributed, 356 were effectively returned, with an effective response rate of 98.6% (356/361). The Chinese version of C-DBAS-14 contained 14 items across four dimensions. The scale-level content validity index was 0.976, and the item-level content validity index ranged from 0.833 to 1.000. Totally four common factors were extracted in exploratory factor analysis, explaining 78.8% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a Chi-square/degrees of freedom ratio of 1.286, comparative fit index of 0.991, goodness of fit index of 0.945, incremental fit index of 0.991, Tucker-Lewis index of 0.988, and root mean square error of approximation of 0.036. The total Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.874, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.863. The C-DBAS-14 score was negatively correlated with the ISI and HADS scores (r=-0.734, -0.639 P<0.01) . Conclusions The Chinese version of C-DBAS-14 has good reliability and validity and can be used as an assessment tool for irrational sleep beliefs in Chinese cancer patients.
Abstract
Objective To translate the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale for Cancer Patients (C-DBAS-14) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity. Methods The Korean version of C-DBAS-14 was translated, back-translated, and culturally adapted into Chinese based on Brislin's translation model, forming the Chinese version of C-DBAS-14. From October 2022 to May 2023, 361 hospitalized cancer patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were selected as research objects by convenient sampling method. They were surveyed using a general information questionnaire, the Chinese version of C-DBAS-14, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. The scale's item analysis was based on correlation coefficients and critical ratio values structural validity, content validity, and convergent validity were used to evaluate the scale's validity Cronbach's α coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to assess its reliability. Results A total of 361 questionnaires were distributed, 356 were effectively returned, with an effective response rate of 98.6% (356/361). The Chinese version of C-DBAS-14 contained 14 items across four dimensions. The scale-level content validity index was 0.976, and the item-level content validity index ranged from 0.833 to 1.000. Totally four common factors were extracted in exploratory factor analysis, explaining 78.8% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a Chi-square/degrees of freedom ratio of 1.286, comparative fit index of 0.991, goodness of fit index of 0.945, incremental fit index of 0.991, Tucker-Lewis index of 0.988, and root mean square error of approximation of 0.036. The total Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.874, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.863. The C-DBAS-14 score was negatively correlated with the ISI and HADS scores (r=-0.734, -0.639 P<0.01) . Conclusions The Chinese version of C-DBAS-14 has good reliability and validity and can be used as an assessment tool for irrational sleep beliefs in Chinese cancer patients.
关键词
肿瘤/信度/效度/睡眠/信念与态度
Key words
Neoplasms/Reliability/Validity/Sleep/Beliefs and attitudes
万方数据