首页|机器学习预测肱骨近端骨折钢板内固定后继发性螺钉切出的风险

机器学习预测肱骨近端骨折钢板内固定后继发性螺钉切出的风险

扫码查看
背景:继发性螺钉切出关节面是肱骨近端骨折锁定钢板内固定术后的主要并发症之一,切出的螺钉会磨损关节盂和引起肩峰撞击,影响肩关节功能.因此,准确的风险预测有积极的临床意义.目的:通过机器学习方法筛选肱骨近端骨折钢板内固定后继发性螺钉切出的风险因素,开发并验证风险预测模型,便于临床医生早期甄别并干预高风险患者.方法:收集2013年6月至2022年6月接受锁定钢板内固定治疗的214例肱骨近端骨折患者的临床资料作为训练组建立模型,将同一时间段另一医院收治的同类患者61例纳入外部验证组.按照患者术后是否出现继发性螺钉切出,分为螺钉切出组和螺钉维持组.训练组利用随机森林、支持向量机、逻辑回归3种机器学习算法构建预测模型;采用递归特征消除法、10折交叉验证重抽样作为变量的筛选方法,并将3种模型准确度最高时纳入变量的交集作为与螺钉切出高度相关的可靠风险变量.通过R语言软件构建动态预测模型,以网页计算器形式展示,并对模型进行内、外部验证.模型内部检验采用Bootstrap法重抽样1 000次,使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积、校准曲线、临床决策曲线评价模型的区分度、校准能力及临床应用价值.通过Youden指数确定预测模型的最佳风险分界值,据此将外部验证组患者分为高、低风险组,根据模型风险预测能力的准确度来评价其稳定性和外延性.结果与结论:①机器学习算法筛选出继发性螺钉切出高度相关的4个风险变量,分别为肱骨近端内侧柱皮质支撑、三角肌结节指数、骨折类型及术后复位情况;②构建的风险预测模型表现出良好的区分度和准确度[曲线下面积=0.874,95%置信区间(0.827,0.922)],校准曲线显示模型预测风险和实际发生风险有较好的一致性;③临床决策曲线提示风险阈值概率在0.1-0.75范围内时,模型具有较好的临床适用性;④风险概率为26%是模型风险分层的最佳阈值,外部验证组利用模型风险分层预测螺钉切出的总正确率为84%;⑤结果说明该风险预测模型准确度和外延性较好,可为指导临床治疗提供依据.
Machine learning prediction of the risk of secondary screw perforation after plate internal fixation for proximal humerus fractures
BACKGROUND:Secondary screw perforation of the articular surface is one of the major complications after locking plate internal fixation of proximal humerus fracture,and cut-out screws can damage shoulder function by abrading the glenoid and causing impingement of the acromion.Therefore,accurate risk prediction has positive clinical significance.OBJECTIVE:To screen risk factors for secondary screw perforation after proximal humerus fracture plating by machine learning methods,and to develop and validate a risk prediction model that facilitates clinicians to identify and intervene in high-risk patients at an early stage.METHODS:Clinical data of 214 patients with proximal humerus fractures who underwent locking plate internal fixation from June 2013 to June 2022 were collected as a training group to establish the model,and 61 similar patients from another hospital in the same period were included in the external validation group.The patients were divided into secondary screw perforation and screw maintenance groups according to whether they developed secondary screw perforation after surgery.The training group used three machine learning algorithms,namely,random forest,support vector machine,and logistic regression,to construct the prediction model.The recursive feature elimination method was used,and 10-fold cross-validation resampling was used as the screening method for the variables,and the intersection of the variables that were included when the accuracy of the three models was the highest was taken as the highly correlated with the secondary screw perforation reliable risk variables.The dynamic predictive model was constructed by R language software and presented as a web calculator,and the model was internally and externally validated.The internal test of the model was conducted by the Bootstrap method with 1 000 resamples,and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve,the calibration curve,and the clinical decision curve were used to evaluate the differentiation,calibration ability,and clinical application value of the model.The Youden index was used to determine the optimal risk threshold of the prediction model,according to which the patients in the external validation group were divided into high-and low-risk groups,and the stability and extensibility of the model were evaluated according to the accuracy of its risk prediction ability.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)The machine learning algorithm identified four risk variables that were highly correlated with secondary screw perforation,namely cortical support of the proximal medial humeral column,deltoid tuberosity index,fracture type,and postoperative reduction.(2)The constructed risk prediction model showed good discrimination and accuracy[area under the curve=0.874,95%confidence interval(0.827,0.922)],and the calibration curve showed good agreement between the model predicted risk and the actual occurrence risk.(3)The clinical decision curve suggested that the model had good clinical applicability when the probability of the risk threshold was in the 0.1-0.75 range.(4)A risk probability of 26%was the optimal threshold for model risk stratification,and the external validation group used model risk stratification to predict secondary screw perforation with an overall accuracy rate of 84%.(5)The risk prediction model has good accuracy and extrapolation,and may provide a basis for guiding clinical treatment.

proximal humeral fracturesecondary screw perforationmachine learninginfluencing factorrisk prediction model

徐大星、涂泽松、纪木强、许伟鹏、牛维

展开 >

广州中医药大学,广东省 广州市 510006

佛山市中医院三水医院骨科,广东省佛山市 528100

佛山市中医院骨科,广东省佛山市 528000

广东省中医院关节外科,广东省 广州市 510120

展开 >

肱骨近端骨折 继发性螺钉切出 机器学习 影响因素 风险预测模型

2025

中国组织工程研究
中国康复医学会,《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》杂志社

中国组织工程研究

北大核心
影响因子:1.387
ISSN:2095-4344
年,卷(期):2025.29(15)