首页|鼻内镜、显微镜配合支撑喉镜在声带息肉手术中的应用对比

鼻内镜、显微镜配合支撑喉镜在声带息肉手术中的应用对比

扫码查看
目的:对比鼻内镜、显微镜配合支撑喉镜在声带息肉手术中的应用效果。方法:选取 79 例声带前息肉患者,根据术式不同分为A组和B组,对比 2 组手术相关指标差异。结果:A组手术时间长于B组(P<0。05),术中声带息肉完全暴露率高于B组(P<0。05);术后 6 个月,A组总有效率高于B组;B组手术无效者均为声带息肉显露困难者;2 组总并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论:采取鼻内镜配合支撑喉镜治疗声带息肉的手术时间较长,但在声带息肉暴露困难患者的效果较好。除此之外,两种术式可灵活选择。
Comparison of nasal endoscopy and microscopy with supported laryngoscopy in vocal cord polyp surgery
Objective:To compare the effectiveness of nasal endoscopy and microscopy with supported laryngoscopy in vocal fold polyp surgery.Methods:79 patients with anterior vocal fold polyps were selected and divided into Group A and Group B according to the procedure,to compare the differences in the surgery-related indexes between the 2 groups.Results:Group A took longer to operate than group B(P<0.05),and the intraoperative rate of complete exposure of vocal fold polyps was higher than that of group B(P<0.05);at 6 months after the operation,the overall effective rate of group A was higher than that of group B;all the surgical invalids in group B were difficult to reveal vocal fold polyps;the difference in the overall complication rate between the 2 groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:Taking a nasal endoscope with a supported laryngoscope for vocal fold polyps has a longer operative time,but is more effective in patients with difficult exposure of vocal fold polyps.In addition to this,the two procedures can be chosen flexibly.

Nasal endoscopyMicroscopeSupporting laryngoscopePolyp of vocal cordsApplication effect

陈红、金玮、徐盼盼

展开 >

安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院耳鼻喉头颈外科,安徽巢湖 238000

鼻内镜 显微镜 支撑喉镜 声带息肉

2024

现代科学仪器
中国分析测试协会

现代科学仪器

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.329
ISSN:1003-8892
年,卷(期):2024.41(2)
  • 18