鼻内镜、显微镜配合支撑喉镜在声带息肉手术中的应用对比
Comparison of nasal endoscopy and microscopy with supported laryngoscopy in vocal cord polyp surgery
陈红 1金玮 1徐盼盼1
作者信息
- 1. 安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院耳鼻喉头颈外科,安徽巢湖 238000
- 折叠
摘要
目的:对比鼻内镜、显微镜配合支撑喉镜在声带息肉手术中的应用效果.方法:选取 79 例声带前息肉患者,根据术式不同分为A组和B组,对比 2 组手术相关指标差异.结果:A组手术时间长于B组(P＜0.05),术中声带息肉完全暴露率高于B组(P＜0.05);术后 6 个月,A组总有效率高于B组;B组手术无效者均为声带息肉显露困难者;2 组总并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论:采取鼻内镜配合支撑喉镜治疗声带息肉的手术时间较长,但在声带息肉暴露困难患者的效果较好.除此之外,两种术式可灵活选择.
Abstract
Objective:To compare the effectiveness of nasal endoscopy and microscopy with supported laryngoscopy in vocal fold polyp surgery.Methods:79 patients with anterior vocal fold polyps were selected and divided into Group A and Group B according to the procedure,to compare the differences in the surgery-related indexes between the 2 groups.Results:Group A took longer to operate than group B(P<0.05),and the intraoperative rate of complete exposure of vocal fold polyps was higher than that of group B(P<0.05);at 6 months after the operation,the overall effective rate of group A was higher than that of group B;all the surgical invalids in group B were difficult to reveal vocal fold polyps;the difference in the overall complication rate between the 2 groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:Taking a nasal endoscope with a supported laryngoscope for vocal fold polyps has a longer operative time,but is more effective in patients with difficult exposure of vocal fold polyps.In addition to this,the two procedures can be chosen flexibly.
关键词
鼻内镜/显微镜/支撑喉镜/声带息肉Key words
Nasal endoscopy/Microscope/Supporting laryngoscope/Polyp of vocal cords/Application effect引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
万方数据