不同湿化方式在颅脑损伤非机械通气气管切开中的应用
Application of different humidification methods in non-mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy for craniocerebral injury
马玲玲 1何青 1刘勤1
作者信息
- 1. 皖西卫生职业学院附属医院神经外科,安徽六安 237000
- 折叠
摘要
目的:比较不同湿化方式分别运用于颅脑损伤非机械通气气管切开中的应用效果.方法:选取 2021年 1月～2023年 10月期间于本院进行非机械通气气管切开的 80例颅脑损伤患者为研究对象,以本院 2021年 12月收治的患者为A组(43例),其余为B组(37例),其中A组进行文丘里氧疗温湿化,B组进行微量泵持续滴入法湿化,对比两组通气期间生命体征、氧疗效、吸痰次数、湿化效果及并发症发生情况.结果:治疗后A组患者生命体征、氧疗效、吸痰次数、湿化效果及并发症发生情况均明显优于B组(P＜0.05).结论:文丘里氧疗温湿化效果确切,治疗效果较优.
Abstract
Objective:To compare the application effects of different humidification methodsin non-mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy for craniocerebral injury.Methods:Eighty patients with craniocerebral injury who underwent non-mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy in the hospital from January 2021 to October 2023 were selected as the study subjects.Among them,those admitted in December 2021 were included in group A(43 cases)and the other were included in group B(37 cases).Group A received Venturi oxygen therapy warm humidification while group B received humidification via micro pump continuous infusion.Vital signs,effects of oxygen therapy,frequency of sputum suction,humidification effect and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results:After treatment,vital signs,effects of oxygen therapy,frequency of sputum suction,humidification effect and the incidence of complications in group A were significantly better than those in group B(P＜0.05).Conclusion:Venturi oxygen therapy warm humidification can achieve better humidification effect and therapeutic effect.
关键词
文丘里氧疗温湿化/微量泵持续滴入法湿化/颅脑损伤/非机械通气气管切开Key words
Venturi oxygen therapy warm humidification/Humidification via micro pump continuous infusion/Craniocerebral injury/Non-mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
万方数据