Comparison of options and postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma
张梅玲 1黄安幸 2薛磊 3张翔
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
作者信息
1. 1南京医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤科，南京 210029
2. 2南京医科大学第一临床医学院，南京 211166
3. 3南京医科大学第一附属医院胸外科，南京 210029
折叠
摘要
探讨食管癌患者微创和开放手术的选择和术后并发症的差异。研究发现微创手术与开放手术有相似的淋巴结清扫效果，同时术后浆膜腔积液的发生率更低。临床上，相较于开放手术，微创手术更多地选择性应用于早期及上、中段食管癌患者。 To investigate the differences in options and postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) . Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has a similar effect with open surgery in lymph nodes dissection, as well as a lower incidence of serous membrane fluid. Clinically, compared with open surgery, MIE was often selectively applied to patients with early EC and upper and middle EC.
Abstract
To investigate the differences in options and postoperative complications between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) . Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has a similar effect with open surgery in lymph nodes dissection, as well as a lower incidence of serous membrane fluid. Clinically, compared with open surgery, MIE was often selectively applied to patients with early EC and upper and middle EC.
万方数据