首页|不同锚杆支护体系防岩爆适宜性分析与锚杆参数优化研究

不同锚杆支护体系防岩爆适宜性分析与锚杆参数优化研究

扫码查看
为研究以锚杆为核心的主动支护技术在岩爆隧道中的支护效果,以九岭山隧道为依托工程,通过应力解除法及点荷载试验得到洞壁二次应力和岩石强度,并开展岩爆判据适宜性比选分析与隧道初始应力场反演,在此基础上从应力和能量角度,对比分析主、被动支护对岩爆的控制效果,并针对不同岩爆等级下主动支护体系关键参数进行探究.研究结果表明:(1)主动支护相比于被动支护能明显降低洞周的σθ/Rb最大值,抑制岩爆发生的烈度;主动支护的"吸能释能"作用更强,主动支护模式更符合岩爆隧道的支护理念;(2)增大锚杆强度与减小锚杆间距皆可以提高主动支护体系对岩爆的防治效果;(3)对于提高中等、强烈岩爆防治效果,提升锚杆强度比减小锚杆间距更有意义,且更加经济.
Analysis of the Suitability of Different Anchor Bolt Support Systems for Rockburst Mitigation and Optimization of Anchor Bolt Parameters
To evaluate the support effectiveness of active rockboltanchor bolt-based active support systems in rock-burst-prone tunnels,a case study was conducted based on the Jiulingshan Tunnel.The secondary stress on tunnel walls and rock strength were obtained using the stress relief method and point load test.A comparative analysis of the suitability of rockburst prediction criteria was carried out,along with inversion of the initial stress field of the tunnel.Based on these results,the rockburst suppression mitigation effects of active and passive support systems were compared from the perspectives of stress and energy.Additionally,the key parameters of active support sys-tems under varying different rockburst gradelevels were explored.The findings indicate the followingthat:(1)Com-pared to passive support,the active support system can significantly reduces the maximum value ofσθ/Rb around the tunnel the maximum stress around the tunnel and suppresses the intensity of rockburst intensityoccurrences.The"energy absorption and release"effect of the active support system is more pronounced,aligning better with the prin-ciples of rockburst mitigation;(2)Increasing rockbolt anchor bolt strength and decreasing rockanchor bolt spacing both can improve the performance of the active support systems in mitigating rockburst;(3)For medium and intense rockburst scenarios,enhancing rockbolt anchor bolt strength proves to be more effective and economical than reducing rockbolt anchor bolt spacing.

Tunnel engineeringActive supportRockburst predictionNumerical simulationStress relief method

张成友、汪波、杜泽昊、高筠涵、谭力豪

展开 >

西南交通大学交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,成都 610031

成都利君实业股份有限公司,成都 610041

隧道工程 主动支护 岩爆预测 数值模拟 应力解除法

2024

现代隧道技术
中铁西南科学研究院有限公司 中国土木工程学会隧道及地下工程分会

现代隧道技术

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.493
ISSN:1009-6582
年,卷(期):2024.61(6)