庭审事实重构中律师说服行为的功能语义构型
Functional Semantic Configuration of Lawyers'Persuasion in Fact Reconstruction
吴启竞1
作者信息
摘要
庭审事实重构中律师经验意义的传递是律师说服行为的基础,这些意义由功能语义构型表征.本研究结合系统功能语言学中的核心关系和律师说服行为的语境因素搭建分析框架,探讨庭审事实重构中律师说服行为的功能语义构型及其说服作用.通过对自建庭审话语语料库进行质性标注和量化分析,本研究发现了律师说服行为的六种典型功能语义构型,它们在特定庭审阶段中呈现出使用倾向.由于这些语义构型能够清晰表明律师争取审判人员认同的目的,适合所在庭审阶段且符合律师职业伦理规范,因此具有很好的说服作用.
Abstract
Lawyers'persuasion is grounded in the transmission of lawyers'experiential meaning in trial fact reconstruction,which is embodied in functional semantic configurations.This study constructs an analytical framework combining the nuclear relations in Systemic Functional Linguistics and the contextual factors of lawyers'persuasion.It then explores the functional semantic configurations of lawyers'persuasion and their persuasive effects in trial fact reconstruction.Through the qualitative annotation and quantitative analysis of the self-built courtroom discourse corpus,this study finds that lawyers'persuasion is embodied typically in six types of functional semantic configurations and they tend to be used at certain trial stages.These semantic configurations can clearly indicate lawyers'purpose of seeking recognition from judicial officers,suit the trial stage they are at,and conform to lawyers'code of ethics,thus achieving good persuasive effects.
关键词
事实重构/律师说服行为/功能语义构型/核心关系Key words
fact reconstruction/lawyers'persuasion/functional semantic configuration/nuclear relations引用本文复制引用
基金项目
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(22YJC740085)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据