首页|分支型主动脉覆膜支架治疗Stanford B型主动脉夹层的临床使用评价

分支型主动脉覆膜支架治疗Stanford B型主动脉夹层的临床使用评价

扫码查看
目的 基于真实世界的数据多维度评估分支型主动脉覆膜支架治疗锚定区不足的主动脉夹层StanFord B型的安全性、有效性、经济性,为临床的合理使用提供科学依据。方法 选取2021 年1 月—2023 年6 月在内蒙古自治区人民医院治疗的胸主动脉夹层Stanford B型伴锚定区不足的患者71 例。根据腔内修复术手段的不同,分为观察组32 例、对照组39 例。根据各种方法的相关临床数据,对其围手术期和随访期的主要观察指标、次要观察指标进行统计学分析,对比各组的临床效果。结果 两组患者在基线资料、既往史、实验室检查指标情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。术后实验室指标检查、围手术期不利医学事件情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。两组手术安全性大致相似。观察组术中出血量小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。两组术后即刻效果、术后2 月随访情况对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。使用分支型主动脉覆膜支架治疗有效性优于杂交手术治疗。观察组手术时间、术后住院时间、总住院时间方面明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。两组在住院总费用、医用耗材费用、植入材料费用方面,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。使用分支型主动脉覆膜支架治疗经济性优于杂交手术治疗。结论 分支型主动脉覆膜支架治疗胸主动脉夹层疾病安全有效,经济适中,且适用范围广,适用于锚定区不足的胸主动脉夹层Stanford B型患者腔内治疗,术后远期效果有待进一步跟踪,真实世界数据有待扩充。
Evaluation of branched aortic Stent-Graft in the treatment of stanford type B aortic dissection
Objective Based on real-world data,multi-dimensional evaluation of the safety,effectiveness and economy of Branched Aortic Stent Graft in the treatment of aortic dissection with insufficient anchor zone StanFord B provides scientific basis for rational clinical use.Methods Seventy-one patients with Stanford type B thoracic aortic dissection with insufficient anchoring zone treated in hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected.The patients were divided into observation group(32 cases)and control group(39 cases)according to different endovascular repair methods.According to the relevant clinical data of various methods,the main observation indicators and secondary observation indicators of perioperative period and follow-up period were statistically analyzed,and the clinical effects of each group were compared.Resluts There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the baseline data,past medical history and laboratory test indicators(P>0.05).There was no statistical difference between the postoperative laboratory indexes and perioperative adverse medical events(P>0.05).The surgical safety of the two groups was similar.Intraoperative blood loss in observation group was less than that in control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in immediate postoperative effect and postoperative 2-month follow-up(P>0.05).The efficacy of treatment with branched aortic stent graft was better than that of hybrid surgery.The operation time,postoperative hospitalization days and total hospitalization days of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in total hospitalization expenses,medical consumables expenses and implant material expenses between the two groups(P>0.05).The economic efficiency of using branched aortic stent graft was better than that of hybrid surgery.Conclusion Branched aortic stent graft is safe and effective in the treatment of thoracic aortic dissection,economical and suitable for a wide range of applications.It is suitable for endovascular treatment of Stanford type B thoracic aortic dissection patients with insufficient anchor area.The long-term effect after surgery needs to be further tracked.The real-world data need to be expanded.

Branched aortic stent graftStanford type B thoracic aortic dissectionInadequate anchoring zoneClinical use evaluationReal world

李艳娜、张淼、李岳飞、夏慧琳

展开 >

内蒙古自治区人民医院医学工程处,呼和浩特 010017

分支型主动脉覆膜支架 胸主动脉夹层Stanford B型 锚定区不足 临床使用评价 真实世界

内蒙古自治区科技成果转化专项资金项目

2021CG0052

2024

现代仪器与医疗
中国科学器材公司

现代仪器与医疗

影响因子:1.47
ISSN:2095-5200
年,卷(期):2024.30(3)