首页|宏基因组二代测序在重症急性胰腺炎疑似感染病原学诊断中的应用价值

宏基因组二代测序在重症急性胰腺炎疑似感染病原学诊断中的应用价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨宏基因组二代测序(mNGS)在重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)疑似感染病原学诊断中的应用价值.方法 采用前瞻性研究方法.选取2023年5-9月中南大学湘雅医院收治的25例SAP疑似感染患者的临床资料.患者均采集双上肢静脉血行mNGS和常规病原学培养检测.观察指标:(1)入组患者情况.(2)mNGS与常规病原学培养检测诊断效能的比较.(3)外周血病原学检测结果与胰周积液培养检测结果.(4)检测时间与费用.正态分布的计量资料以(x)±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验.偏态分布的计量资料以M(Q1,Q3)表示.计数资料以绝对数或百分比表示,组间比较采用x2检验.结果 (1)入组患者情况.筛选出符合条件的患者25例;男18例,女7例;年龄为48(40,59)岁;住院时间为30(20,50)d.25例患者病因包括高脂血症性胰腺炎14例、胆源性胰腺炎8例、酒精性胰腺炎1例、其他2例.25例患者中,感染性胰腺坏死(IPN)17例(死亡7例),无菌性胰腺坏死8例(均未死亡).(2)mNGS与常规病原学培养检测诊断效能的比较.mNGS和常规病原学培养检测诊断SAP疑似感染的阳性率分别为72.0%(18/25)和32.0%(8/25),两者比较,差异有统计学意义(x2=8.01,P<0.05).mNGS和常规病原学培养检测诊断IPN的灵敏度分别为94.1%(16/17)和35.3%(6/17),阴性预测值分别为85.7%(6/7)和35.3%(6/17),两者灵敏度和阴性预测值比较,差异均有统计学意义(x2=12.88,5.04,P<0.05);mNGS和常规病原学培养检测诊断IPN的特异度分别为75.0%(6/8)和75.0%(6/8),阳性预测值分别为88.9%(16/18)和75.0%(6/8),两者比较,差异均无统计学意义(x2=0,0.82,P>0.05)o(3)外周血病原学检测结果与胰周积液培养检测结果.17例IPN患者中,mNGS检测出病原菌36株,常规病原学培养检测出病原菌6株.17例IPN患者中,16例mNGS检测病原学结果为阳性,其中13例与胰周积液培养检测病原学结果相符,两者相符率为76.5%(13/17);6例常规病原学培养检测结果为阳性,与胰周积液培养检测结果相符率为35.3%(6/17).(4)检测时间与费用.mNGS检测时间为(43±17)h,常规病原学培养检测时间为(111±36)h,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(t=9.31,P<0.05).mNGS检测费用为(2 267±0)元/例,占住院费用(133 759±120 744)元的1.7%;常规病原学培养检测费用为(240±0)元/例,占住院费用的0.2%.结论 mNGS对SAP疑似感染的早期病原学诊断具有重要价值,且时效性高.
Application value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pathogenic diagnosis of sus-pected infected severe acute pancreatitis
Objective To investigate the application value of metagenomic next-genera-tion sequencing(mNGS)in pathogenic diagnosis of suspected infected severe acute pancreatitis(SAP).Methods The prospective study was conducted.The clinical data of 25 patients with suspected infected SAP who were admitted to the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May to September 2023 were collected.Upper limb venous blood samples of all the patients were collected for both of mNGS and routine pathogen microbial culture.Observation indicators:(1)grouping situations of the enrolled patients;(2)comparison of the diagnostic efficiency of mNGS and routine pathogen microbial culture;(3)results of peripheral blood pathogen microbial testing and peri-pancreatic effusion microbial culture;(4)testing time and cost.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD,and comparison between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(Q1,Q3).Count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages,and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test.Results(1)Grouping situations of the enrolled patients.A total of 25 patients were selected for eligibility.There were 18 males and 7 females,aged 48(40,59)years.The duration of hospital stay of 25 patients was 30(20,50)days.The etiologies of 25 patients included 14 cases of hyperlipidemic pancreatitis,8 cases of biliary pancreatitis,1 case of alcohol-induced acute pancreatitis,and 2 cases of pancreatitis caused by other causes.Of the 25 patients,there were 17 cases with infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN)including 7 cases of death,and 8 cases with sterile pancreatic necrosis including no death.(2)Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency of mNGS and routine pathogen microbial culture.The positive rates of mNGS and routine pathogen microbial culture in diagnosis of suspected infected SAP were 72.0%(18/25)and 32.0%(8/25),respectively,showing a significant difference between them(x2=8.01,P<0.05).The sensitivity and negative predic-tive value of mNGS and routine pathogen microbial culture in diagnosis of IPN were 94.1%(16/17),35.3%(6/17)and 85.7%(6/7),35.3%(6/17),showing significant differences between them(x2=12.88,5.04,P<0.05).The specificity and positive predictive value of mNGS and routine pathogen microbial culture in diagnosis of IPN were 75.0%(6/8),75.0%(6/8)and 88.9%(16/18),75.0%(6/8),showing no significant difference between them(x2=0,0.82,P>0.05).(3)Results of peripheral blood pathogen microbial testing and peripancreatic effusion microbial culture.Of the 17 patients with IPN,36 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected by mNGS,and 6 strains were detected by routine pathogen microbial culture.There were 16 of 17 patients with IPN showing positive mNGS pathogenic testing,of which 13 cases were consistent with the pathogenic testing results of peri-pancreatic effusion microbial culture,showing a consistency rate of 76.5%(13/17).There were 6 pati-ents with IPN showing positive routine pathogen microbial culture,with a consistency rate of 35.3%(6/17)to peripancreatic effusion microbial culture.(4)Testing time and cost.Testing time of mNGS and routine pathogen microbial culture were(43±17)hours and(111±36)hours,showing a signifi-cant difference between them(t=9.31,P<0.05).Testing cost of mNGS was(2 267±0)yuan/case,accoun-ting for 1.7%of the hospitalization expenses of(133 759±120 744)yuan/case.Testing cost of routine pathogen microbial culture was(240±0)yuan/case,accounting of 0.2%of the hospitalization expenses.Conclusion mNGS has important value for early pathogenic diagnosis of suspected infected SAP,and has a high timeliness.

Severe acute pancreatitisInfected pancreatic necrosisMetagenomic next-generation sequencingDiagnosisTherapy

洪晓悦、林嘉晏、李嘉荣、宁彩虹、孙泽芳、刘柏岐、陈璐、朱帅、黄耿文、申鼎成

展开 >

中南大学湘雅医院胰腺外科疝与腹壁外科,长沙 410008

重症急性胰腺炎 感染性胰腺坏死 宏基因组二代测序 诊断 治疗

国家资助博士后研究人员计划湖南省自然科学基金中南大学湘雅医院青年科研基金

GZB202308722023JJ308852023Q13

2024

中华消化外科杂志
中华医学会

中华消化外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.899
ISSN:1673-9752
年,卷(期):2024.23(5)
  • 9