首页|刑民交叉视野下犯罪认定与合同效力关系研究

刑民交叉视野下犯罪认定与合同效力关系研究

扫码查看
当合同行为与犯罪行为产生交叉时,判决重点在于明确合同效力与犯罪认定之间的关系.合同效力与犯罪认定分属于不同法律的规范内容,不能相互证成.行为人涉嫌刑事犯罪,不必然导致合同无效,合同效力依据民事法律的规定予以认定;即使存在有效合同,也不能成为阻却犯罪成立的直接理由,刑法要将对合同效力的判断进一步转化为对行为违法性的判断.行为违法性以缓和的违法一元论为基本立场,民法允许的行为,必然不具有刑事违法性;民法禁止的行为,不一定具有刑事违法性.在此基础上,刑法与民法关系的认定应采用相对从属性原则,从属性体现在刑事违法性以前置法设定的一般违法性为前提,相对性体现在一般违法性与刑事违法性造成法益侵害的量存在区别.
On Relationship Between Crime Determination and Contract Validity in Criminal and Civil Cross Cases
When there is an intersection between contract acts and criminal acts,the focus of the judgment is to clarify the relationship between contract validity and crime determination.They belong to different legal norms and cannot be mutually prov-en.If the perpetrator is suspected of committing a criminal offense,it does not necessarily lead to the invalidity of the contract.The validity of the contract shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of civil law;even if there is a valid contract,it cannot be a direct reason to prevent the establishment of the crime.Criminal law should further transform the judgment of the va-lidity of the contract into the judgment of the illegality of the act.The illegality of behavior is based on the monism of mitigated il-legality,and behaviors allowed by civil law must not have criminal illegality;acts prohibited by civil law may not necessarily have criminal illegality.On this basis,the determination of the relationship between criminal law and civil law should adopt the principle of relative subordination.The subordination is reflected in the general illegality established by the law before criminal illegality,and the relativity is reflected in the difference in the amount of legal interest infringement caused by general illegality and criminal illegality.

criminal and civil cross casecontract validitycrime determinationmoderating illegal monism

毛乃纯、李思渝

展开 >

郑州大学,河南郑州 450001

刑民交叉 合同效力 犯罪认定 缓和的违法一元论

中国犯罪学学会研究课题

FZXXH2022F17

2024

新疆财经大学学报
新疆财经大学

新疆财经大学学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.527
ISSN:1671-9840
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 37