Voluntary Withdrawal from Collective Economic Organization Shares:Theoretical Logic and Institutional Construction
The voluntary withdrawal of collective members from collective economic organization shares is a crucial part in advanc-ing the reform of rural collective property rights systems.However,due to the unclear mechanism of its own generation,the feasibili-ty of external transfer remains ambiguous,leading to confusion regarding the practical and procedural conditions.In this regard,it is necessary to recognize that the essence of shares in collective economic organizations lies in the right to benefit distribution rath-er than in member rights,while adhering to existing regulations and the original intent of preserving collective ownership.In ad-dressing conflicts among collective members,collective economic organizations,and external members,the focus should be on maintaining collective ownership.A systematic review of the value orientations inherent is required in agricultural land contracting rights,homestead usage rights,and collective economic organization shares.Therefore,balancing interests should prioritize the ben-efits of collective members and exert the economic functions of collective shares.Consequently,the feasibility of the external trans-fer of collective shares should be affirmed.Meanwhile,in order to prevent social capital from eroding collective ownership,the peri-od and proportion of shares held by social capital should be moderately regulated,and collective members should be given priority of purchase rights.These measures suggest that while voluntary withdrawal from shares should not be subject to substantial con-straints,procedural adjustments should involve household-level applications and grant review authority to collective economic orga-nizations to ensure market-oriented operations.
collective asset sharesvoluntary withdrawalincome distribution rightsinterest balance
万方数据
维普
