首页|关节周围浸润镇痛联合去阿片化全麻在全髋关节置换术中的应用

关节周围浸润镇痛联合去阿片化全麻在全髋关节置换术中的应用

扫码查看
目的 探讨关节周围浸润镇痛联合去阿片化全麻在全髋关节置换术中的应用效果.方法 选取2021年8月至2023年8月在本院行全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗的患者98例,采用随机数字表法分为观察组、对照组,每组各49例.对照组实施常规全麻,观察组实施关节周围浸润镇痛联合去阿片化全麻.对比两组患者围术期血流动力学指标及炎症应激指标变化.术后2、6、12、24 h分别采用数字评定量表(NRS)评估患者疼痛程度.统计两组患者首次下床活动时间、首次步行距离、住院时间、不良反应、认知功能障碍、谵妄发生情况.出院时采用Harris评分评估患者髋关节功能.结果 手术开始后10 min观察组患者心率(HR),平均动脉压(MAP)高于对照组患者,术中、术毕观察组患者HR、MAP低于对照组患者(P<0.05).两组患者术后2、6、12、24 h静息及运动NRS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后24、72 h观察组患者白介素(Ⅱ)-6、IL-1β、C反应蛋白(CRP)、血红素氧合酶-1(HO-1)水平低于对照组患者(P<0.05).观察组患者首次下床活动时间、住院时间短于对照组患者,首次步行距离长于对照组患者(P<0.05).两组患者出院时Harris评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).观察组患者恶心呕吐、头晕、股四头肌肌无力发生率低于对照组(P<0.05).观察组患者术后24、72 h简易精神状态量表(MMSE)评分高于对照组(P<0.05).观察组患者认知功能障碍、谵妄发生率低于对照组(P<0.05).结论 关节周围浸润镇痛联合去阿片化全麻在THA中镇痛效果良好,有利于维持患者血流动力学稳定,减轻炎症应激反应,促进术后恢复,降低不良反应、认知功能障碍及谵妄发生率.
Application of periarticular infiltration analgesia combined with deopioid general anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty
Objective To investigate the effect of periarticular infiltration analgesia combined with deopioid anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty.Methods A total of 98 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty(THA)in the hospital from August 2021 to August 2023 were selected and divided into an observation group and a control group using a random number table method,with 49 patients in each group.The con-trol group received conventional anesthesia,and the observation group received periarticular infiltration an-algesia combined with deopioid anesthesia.The perioperative hemodynamic indexes and inflammatory stress indexes were compared between the 2 groups of the patients.Numerical rating scale(NRS)was used to evaluate the pain degree at 2,6,12 and 24 h after the surgery.The first time of getting out of bed,the first walking distance,the length of hospital stay,adverse reactions,cognitive dysfunction and delirium were analyzed.Hip function was assessed by Harris score at discharge.Results The heart rate(HR)and mean arterial pressure(MAP)of the patients in the observation group were higher than those of the control group 10 minutes into the surgery,and the HR and MAP of the patients in the observation group were lower than those of the control group during and after the surgery(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in resting and exercise NRS scores between the 2 groups at 2,6,12 and 24 h after the surgery(P>0.05).The levels of interleukin-6,IL-1β,C-reactive protein(CRP)and heme oxygenase-1(HO-1)of the patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 24 and 72 h after the surgery(P<0.05).The first time of getting out of bed and staying in hospital of the patients in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,and the first walking distance was lon-ger than that in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in Harris score between the 2 groups at discharge(P>0.05).The incidence of nausea,vomiting,dizziness and quadriceps muscle weakness of the patients in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).The score of simple mental state scale(MMSE)of the patients in the observation group was higher than that in control group at 24 and 72 h after operation(P<0.05).The incidence of cognitive dysfunction and delirium of the patients in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Periarticular infiltration analgesia combined with deopioid anesthesia has good analgesic effect in total hip arthroplasty,which is conducive to maintaining hemodynamic stability,alleviating inflammato-ry stress,promoting postoperative recovery,and reducing the incidence of adverse reactions,cognitive dysfunction and delirium.

periarticular infiltration analgesiadeopioid general anesthesiatotal hip replacementstress re-actioncognitive functiondelirium

徐婷婷、程晓辉、郭继燕、黄汶聪

展开 >

菏泽市立医院麻醉科,山东 菏泽 274000

关节周围浸润镇痛 去阿片化全麻 全髋关节置换术 应激反应 认知功能 谵妄

山东省重点研发计划项目

2020GSF2392

2024

新疆医科大学学报
新疆医科大学

新疆医科大学学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.76
ISSN:1009-5551
年,卷(期):2024.47(6)