首页|个体随机模型驱动的疫苗直接和间接效果评估

个体随机模型驱动的疫苗直接和间接效果评估

扫码查看
[目的]丰富国内疫苗效果评估策略,为制定免疫计划或筛选/候选疫苗提供科学依据.[方法]采用基于人群均匀混合假设的个体随机模型,以新型冠状病毒Omicron变异株为例,考虑疾病自然史、人群接触度、疫苗覆盖率和效果等因素,将个体层面疫苗的防感染和防传播效果推及群体层面的直接和间接效果.[结果]模拟结果分4个场景讨论仅提升疫苗覆盖率(vaccine coverage,VC)或仅提升疫苗效果(vaccine effectiveness,VE)的结局指标.当VE分别为0.5和0.9时,将VC从50%提升至90%,受间接效果保护人群的日新增感染率峰值的降幅分别为31.1%和72.1%,大于仅提升VE的场景;但仅提升VE的场景的直接效果不论在累积感染率还是日新增感染率指标上,均优于仅提升VC的场景.疫苗混合效果受直接效果影响较大;要实现10%以上的间接效果,至少需要接种覆盖90%以上的易感者,且疫苗防传播和防感染效果均超过85%,或其中一者接近90%,另一者接近80%.[结论]上述结果表明提升VE相比于提升VC在群体层面上更具有公共卫生学意义.但当前的新型冠状病毒疫苗防感染和防传播效果均不理想,因此加强个体接种来提升VC仍具有重要意义.间接效果随着VC的增加而增加,这将为群体中无法接种的个体提供一定保护作用.
Evaluation of direct and indirect effects of vaccines driven by an individual-based stochastic model
[Objective]Vaccination elicits a specific immune response in vaccinated individuals,resulting in direct effects such as preventing infection,reducing the severity of the disease after infection,and shortening the duration of transmission.In addition,mass vaccination can have indirect effects on unvaccinated people.In the evaluation of vaccines,randomized clinical trials can only assess the efficacy of vaccines under specific conditions and at the individual immunological level.Meanwhile,field trials can measure the effectiveness of vaccines in the real world but do not fully account for the indirect effects of vaccines on the possible impact of vaccination strategy.This study aims to enhance domestic vaccine effectiveness assessment strategies and provide a scientific basis for formulating immunization plans or selecting candidate vaccines.[Methods]This study employs an individual-based stochastic model based on the assumption of uniformly mixed populations,using the example of the Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2.It considers factors such as the natural history of the disease,contact patterns,vaccine coverage,and vaccine effectiveness.In each iteration,the close contacts of individualx are randomly generated,and the natural history status of the disease of all individuals is updated.The number of people in each natural history status and the number of new infections in the vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups at that time step are also calculated.The study extends the individual-level vaccine effects in preventing infection and transmission to direct and indirect effects at the population level.[Results]Simulation results discuss indexes in four scenarios,considering only the improvement of vaccine coverage(VC)or only the enhancement of vaccine effectiveness(VE).When VE is set at 0.5 and 0.9,respectively,increasing VC from 50%to 90%results in reductions of 31.1%and 72.1%in the peak daily infection rate of the population protected by indirect effects.These reductions are greater than those in scenarios focusing solely on improving VE.However,scenarios focusing solely on enhancing VE demonstrate direct effects that are superior in both cumulative and daily new infection rate compared to scenarios with only increased VC.Furthermore,overall vaccine effects are significantly influenced by direct effects.These results indicate that enhancing VE is more meaningful in terms of public health at the population level compared to increasing VC.However,the current effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in preventing infection and transmission is not ideal,emphasizing the continued importance of strengthening individual vaccination to increase vaccine coverage.Moreover,indirect effects increase with the rise in vaccine coverage,providing a certain level of protection for individuals within the population who are unable to receive the vaccine.Under the epidemiological parameter setting of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2,even if the vaccine has a high-level effect against infection and transmission,the indirect effect of the vaccine is still not obvious.Assuming that more than 90%of susceptible individuals have received vaccinations,the vaccine's effectiveness against infection and transmission must be greater than 85%,or the effectiveness of one must be close to 90%and the other to 80%,in order to produce an indirect effect of more than 10%.[Conclusions]The unvaccinated group in the population with deployed vaccination programs showed a lower infection rate than those in which no one is vaccinated.Improving vaccine effectiveness can prevent more infections at the population level than simply increasing vaccine coverage.However,the current SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is not sufficiently effective in preventing infection and transmission,making it crucial to strengthen individual vaccination to improve vaccine coverage.The indirect effect increases with the rise in vaccine coverage,and the growth in the indirect effect will be more significant than that of the direct effect for the same proportional increase in coverage.This enhancement will provide certain protection for people in the population who cannot be vaccinated.

individual-based stochastic modelvaccine effectivenessherd immunitySARS-CoV-2vaccine coverageimmunization schedule

郭怡超、郭晓豪、赵泽宇、陈田木

展开 >

传染病疫苗研发全国重点实验室,厦门大学公共卫生学院,福建 厦门 361102

个体随机模型 疫苗效果 群体免疫 新冠病毒 疫苗覆盖率 免疫计划

国家重点研发计划中央高校基本科研业务费专项

2021YFC230160420720230001

2024

厦门大学学报(自然科学版)
厦门大学

厦门大学学报(自然科学版)

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.449
ISSN:0438-0479
年,卷(期):2024.63(3)
  • 36