首页|等碳量添加秸秆、秸秆生物炭对土壤碳稳定及碳转化的影响

等碳量添加秸秆、秸秆生物炭对土壤碳稳定及碳转化的影响

扫码查看
[目的]探究秸秆和秸秆生物炭在不同土壤含水量条件下还田对土壤碳稳定性和碳转化的影响.[方法]通过土壤培养实验,在土壤中分别添加等碳量的秸秆和秸秆生物炭,在土壤田间持水量的60%、100%和干湿交替条件培养,研究土壤有机碳(SOC)、溶解性有机碳(DOC)、微生物生物量碳(MBC)、易氧化有机碳(ROC)、CO2和CH4的变化.[结果]①培养60 d,等碳量添加秸秆和生物炭使土壤有机碳分别提高48.02%~53.91%和31.55%~42.39%,土壤微生物量碳分别提高243.20%~258.16%和85.67%~101.09%,有机碳损失率表现为秸秆处理(29.27%~34.95%)>生物炭处理(12.25%~21.79%),且秸秆处理的CO2、CH4累积排放量较生物炭处理分别提高75.40%~398.43%和1394.61%~3201.17%,表明秸秆虽能显著提高土壤总有机碳,但同时会激发土壤有机碳损失,提高CO2、CH4排放,固碳减排效果小于生物炭处理.②土壤含水量显著影响土壤有机碳损失率和碳排放.不同外源碳添加处理的土壤有机碳损失率均表现为田间持水量60%(12.25%~29.29%)≤干湿交替(16.61%~29.27%)<田间持水量100%(21.79%~34.95%).秸秆处理在田间持水量100%和干湿交替时的CH4累积排放量比田间持水量60%时分别提高200.96%和139.35%,增幅大于对照组CK.而含水量对生物炭处理的CH4累积排放量的影响相对较小,分别提高36.26%和20.31%,增幅小于对照组CK,这是由于秸秆具有较高的易氧化有机碳含量,且田间持水量100%促进CH4排放.[结论]与秸秆还田相比,秸秆生物炭还田可提高土壤有机碳并降低土壤碳损失率,同时,秸秆生物炭可减缓土壤含水量导致的氧环境差异对土壤碳形态的影响,有效减少单位质量土壤CO2、CH4排放.
Effects of straw and straw-derived biochar with equal carbon incorporation on soil stability and conversion of carbon
[Objective]The paper aimed to investigate the effects on carbon stability and carbon conversion of soil incorporated by straw and straw-derived biochar under different water conditions.[Method]The soil culture experiments were conducted to explore the concentration of soil organic carbon(SOC),dissolved organic carbon(DOC),microbial biomass carbon(MBC),easily oxidized organic carbon(ROC),and the emission of CO2 and CH4,in which the soil was incorporated with equal amounts and straw or straw-derived biochar,respectively,and in-cubated at 60%,100%,and alternating wet and dry conditions of the maximum water holding capacity of the soil field.[Result](ⅰ)After 60 days of incubation,equal carbon addition of straw and biochar increased soil organic carbon by 48.02%-53.91%and 31.55%-42.39%,respectively,and soil microbial carbon increased by 243.20%-258.16%and 85.67%-101.09%,respectively,and the organic carbon loss rate was shown as straw treatment(29.27%-34.95%)>biochar treatment(12.25%-21.79%),and the cumulative emissions of CO2 and CH4 in straw treatment were 75.40%-398.43%and 1394.61%-3201.17%higher than those in biochar treatment,respective-ly,indicating that although straw could significantly increase the total organic carbon of the soil,at the same time,it stimulated the loss of or-ganic carbon of the soil,and increased the emissions of CO2 and CH4,and the carbon sequestration and emission reduction effect were smaller than that of biochar treatment.(ⅱ)Soil water content significantly affected the soil organic carbon loss rate and carbon emission.The SOC loss rates of different exogenous carbon addition treatments all showed 60%of maximum water holding capacity(12.25%-29.29%)dry-wet alternation(16.61%-29.27%)<100%of maximum water holding capacity(21.79%-34.95%).The cumulative CH4 emis-sions of straw treatment at 100%of maximum water holding capacity and the wet-dry alternation treatment were 200.96%and 139.35%higher than those at 60%water holding capacity,respectively,which were greater than those of CK.However,the effect of moisture on cumu-lative CH4 emission from biochar treatment was small,increasing by 36.26%and 20.31%,respectively,which was smaller than that of CK.This was due to the higher content of ROC of straw,and the promotion of CH4 emission resulting from 100%filed water holding capacity.[Conclusion]Compared with straw,biochar returning to field can improve SOC content and reduce the rate of soil carbon loss.At the same time,biochar can mitigate the influence of the difference in oxygen environment caused by soil water content on soil carbon patterns,and ef-fectively reduce CO2 and CH4 emissions per unit mass of soil.

BiocharWater contentStability of soil carbonConversion of soil carbonCarbon emission

袁楚齐、梁媛、韩爽、董泽兴、魏晋元

展开 >

苏州科技大学环境科学与工程学院,江苏苏州 215009

生物炭 含水量 土壤碳稳定性 土壤碳转化 碳排放

2022姑苏乡土人才项目苏州市关键核心技术攻关(社会发展)项目

苏市农人[2023]4号2023SS06

2024

西南农业学报
四川,云南,贵州,广西,西藏及重庆省(区,市)农科院

西南农业学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.679
ISSN:1001-4829
年,卷(期):2024.37(9)