首页|刍议逃税罪"不予追究刑事责任"条款的修正

刍议逃税罪"不予追究刑事责任"条款的修正

扫码查看
近年来,公众人物逃税的数额之多、影响之大,屡屡将《刑法》关于逃税罪"不予追究刑事责任"条款置于风口浪尖。逃税罪"不予追究刑事责任"条款是否合理,至今存在争议,主要体现为肯定论与否定论。从刑法法理角度来看,该条款的设立有违刑法体系化,偏离了对宽严相济刑事政策的正确理解,消解了刑法的一般预防功能;从司法实务和行政实践观察,该条款采取的行刑反转模式已经显现弊端,导致逃税罪实际处理模式不一、公安机关与税务机关查税权力混淆。当前,应基于风险社会背景下的积极预防性立法理念,对该条款进行完善和修正,将"不予追究刑事责任"改为"从轻、减轻刑事责任",同时设置条款适用的数额上限。
Modification of the Clause of"No Criminal Liability"on Tax Evasion Crime
In recent years,the amount and influence of tax evasion by public figures have repeatedly placed the"no criminal liability"clause of the Criminal Law on tax evasion crime in the center of the storm.Whether the provision of Article 201 of the Criminal Lawof China"not subject to criminal liability"is reasonable is still a controversy.From the perspective of the ju-risprudence of the criminal law,this article violates the systematization of criminal law,deviates from the correct understanding of the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity,and dissipates the general preventive function of criminal law.The author overinterprets the modesty of the criminal law.Seen from judicial and administrative practice,this article has shown its drawbacks,resulting in different modes of actual handling of tax evasion crimes and confusion of tax investigation powers between public security organs and tax authorities.Therefore,the clause should be amended based on the concept of positive and preventive legislation in the context of risk society,and the content of"no criminal liability"should be changed to"lighter and less criminal liability",and the upper limit of the applicable amount of tax evasion should be set.

tax evasion crimethe clause of"no criminal liability"criminal sanctionsactive preventive legislation

邓崇专、梅洁

展开 >

广西民族大学法学院,广西南宁 530006

逃税罪 逃税行为 "不予追究刑事责任"条款 刑法制裁 积极预防性立法

2024

西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)
西南石油大学

西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.355
ISSN:1674-5094
年,卷(期):2024.26(2)
  • 37