首页|论备案审查意见的督促纠错功能

论备案审查意见的督促纠错功能

扫码查看
2023年《立法法》修改赋予了全国人民代表大会专门委员会、常务委员会工作机构在审查法规、条例"同宪法或者法律相抵触"或"认为存在合宪性、合法性问题"时,可向制定机关提出"审查意见"的职权.地方人大"备案审查条例"也作出了相应的规定."审查意见"作为强化人大备案审查职能的一项重要举措,一方面,"审查意见"刚性效力远强于修法前的"研究意见";另一方面,"审查意见"能有效督促制定机关及时纠错.作为备案审查外部督促手段,"审查意见"表现为以"沟通""协商"方式,形成兼具法律和政治双重督促效果.为进一步强化人大备案审查中的督促纠错功能,还需明确审查机关"督促"与制定机关"纠错"工作联系机制,明晰"审查意见"的督促对象、督促内容、督促方式等具体细则.
On the Supervisory Correction Function of Record Review Opinions
The 2023 amendment to the"Legislation Law"grants the National People's Congress Specialized Committees and the Standing Committee's working bodies the authority to provide"review opinions"when examining issues"in conflict with the constitution or laws"or when they perceive constitutional or legal issues.The local people's congresses have made corresponding provisions regarding the review and filing of local regulations."Review opinions,"as a crucial measure to enhance the NPC's function of filing review,have more binding force than the pre-amendment"study opinions"and effectively prompt corrective actions by the drafting authorities.To further strengthen the supervisory function in NPC record review,it is essential to clarify the mechanism linking the supervisory role of the reviewing bodies with the corrective actions of the drafting authorities,outlining specific details such as the target,content,and method of supervision for"review opinions."

record and reviewreview opinionssupervisory and correction

温泽彬、李昱辰

展开 >

西南政法大学,重庆40120

备案审查 审查意见 督促纠错

国家高端智库重点研究课题(2022)重庆市研究生科研创新项目(2019)

ZK202203CYB19133

2024

西南政法大学学报
西南政法大学

西南政法大学学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.595
ISSN:1008-4355
年,卷(期):2024.26(1)
  • 51