我国预重整程序中司法介入的路径优化
Optimization of the Path of Judicial Intervention in China's Pre-reorganization Procedure
钮贵玲1
作者信息
摘要
当前,预重整程序中强化司法介入的倾向较为明显,将预重整定位为司法主导的法庭内程序,法院直接介入庭前协商谈判,甚至依职权直接启动预重整程序,将庭中重整阶段的破产职权向庭前扩张.相应观念或做法弱化了当事人意思自治,增加了制度成本,降低了当事人适用预重整程序的积极性.对此,应当厘清司法介入的限度,明晰法院角色,构建司法适度介入的路径.以预重整程序的混合属性为逻辑起点,区分庭前阶段和庭中阶段的不同特性.在庭前重组阶段,以当事人意思自治为主导,通过立案登记、指引规则等后置手段,实现司法适度介入之效用.在庭中重整阶段,根据批准预重整计划草案的不同时间维度,完善预重整计划草案的司法审查规则,实现司法适度介入之效用.
Abstract
In China's pre-reorganization practice,there is an obvious tendency to strengthen judicial involvement in the pre-reorganization procedure,such as the pre-reorganization as an in-court procedure,directly intervenes in the pre-trial consultation and negotiation,directly initiating the procedure ex officio,and expands the bankruptcy authority in the in-court reorganization stage to the pre-trial.This weakens the autonomy of the parties,increases the system's cost,and reduces the enthusiasm of the parties to apply for pre-reorganization.It is necessary to clarify the limits of judicial intervention,the value orientation and the role of the courts,and construct a path for appropriate judicial intervention.Taking the hybrid attributes of pre-reorganization as a logical starting point,the characteristics of the pre-trial and in-court stages are distinguished.In the pre-trial reorganization stage,autonomy of will plays the leading role,and the effect of indirect judicial intervention is realized through post-secondary means such as case filing and registration,guidance rules,etc.In the in-court reorganization stage,the judicial review rules of the draft pre-reorganization plan are improved according to the three dimensions of the approval of the draft pre-reorganization plan,so as to achieve the effect of appropriate judicial intervention.
关键词
预重整/司法介入/意思自治/混合属性/适度介入Key words
pre-reorganization/judicial intervention/autonomy of will/mixed attributes/moderate intervention引用本文复制引用
基金项目
最高人民法院司法案例研究课题(2022-2023)()
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据