首页|法律学说在我国司法裁判说理中的运用及限度

法律学说在我国司法裁判说理中的运用及限度

扫码查看
在我国司法裁判中,法律学说既代表一种知识性权威,也代表一种身份性权威,主要表现为学者观点、法学理论以及实务观点三种类型.在功能主义视角下,法律学说指学者或实务者对法律问题的理论观点、实务处理见解.经验观察表明,法律学说具体发挥着事实认定说理、法律适用说理以及对当事人诉求进行回应的功能.在现行法律体系框架内,法律学说只能作为裁判理由而不是裁判依据,法官援引法律学说需要遵循必要的限度,完成对学说运用的必要性审查、内容审查以及个案论证的融贯性审查.
The Application and Limitations of Legal Doctrines in Judicial Judgment Reasoning in China
In the judicial practice of our country,legal doctrine represents both an intellectual authority and an identity authority,mainly manifested in three types:scholar perspectives,legal theories,and practical perspectives.From a functionalist perspective,Legal doctrine refers to the theoretical viewpoints and practical perspectives of scholars or practitioners on legal issues.Empirical observations have shown that Legal doctrine plays a specific role in factual reasoning,legal application reasoning,and responding to the demands of the parties involved.Within the current legal framework,legal doctrine can only serve as a reason for judgment rather than a basis for judgment.Judges must follow necessary limits when using legal doctrines,and complete the necessary review of the application of doctrine,content review,and coherence review of individual case arguments.

legal doctrinesjudicial reasoninglegal sourceslegal argumentation

周晓帆

展开 >

山东科技大学 文法学院,青岛 266590

法律学说 裁判说理 法律渊源 法律论证

2024

西南政法大学学报
西南政法大学

西南政法大学学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.595
ISSN:1008-4355
年,卷(期):2024.26(6)