西南政法大学学报2024,Vol.26Issue(6) :43-56.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-4355.2024.06.04

法律学说在我国司法裁判说理中的运用及限度

The Application and Limitations of Legal Doctrines in Judicial Judgment Reasoning in China

周晓帆
西南政法大学学报2024,Vol.26Issue(6) :43-56.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-4355.2024.06.04

法律学说在我国司法裁判说理中的运用及限度

The Application and Limitations of Legal Doctrines in Judicial Judgment Reasoning in China

周晓帆1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 山东科技大学 文法学院,青岛 266590
  • 折叠

摘要

在我国司法裁判中,法律学说既代表一种知识性权威,也代表一种身份性权威,主要表现为学者观点、法学理论以及实务观点三种类型.在功能主义视角下,法律学说指学者或实务者对法律问题的理论观点、实务处理见解.经验观察表明,法律学说具体发挥着事实认定说理、法律适用说理以及对当事人诉求进行回应的功能.在现行法律体系框架内,法律学说只能作为裁判理由而不是裁判依据,法官援引法律学说需要遵循必要的限度,完成对学说运用的必要性审查、内容审查以及个案论证的融贯性审查.

Abstract

In the judicial practice of our country,legal doctrine represents both an intellectual authority and an identity authority,mainly manifested in three types:scholar perspectives,legal theories,and practical perspectives.From a functionalist perspective,Legal doctrine refers to the theoretical viewpoints and practical perspectives of scholars or practitioners on legal issues.Empirical observations have shown that Legal doctrine plays a specific role in factual reasoning,legal application reasoning,and responding to the demands of the parties involved.Within the current legal framework,legal doctrine can only serve as a reason for judgment rather than a basis for judgment.Judges must follow necessary limits when using legal doctrines,and complete the necessary review of the application of doctrine,content review,and coherence review of individual case arguments.

关键词

法律学说/裁判说理/法律渊源/法律论证

Key words

legal doctrines/judicial reasoning/legal sources/legal argumentation

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
西南政法大学学报
西南政法大学

西南政法大学学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.595
ISSN:1008-4355
段落导航相关论文