首页|公司濒临破产时董事破产申请义务的立法建构

公司濒临破产时董事破产申请义务的立法建构

扫码查看
公司濒临破产时已经或者即将失去债务清偿能力,此时的经营风险将由股东向债权人进行转移。董事破产申请义务是助力债权人应对上述风险的重要支点,因为这一制度能够有效地遏制股东、董事以及债权人内部的机会主义行为,防止公司资产的持续恶化。在学理上,"直接义务论"和"间接义务论"都可以为其立法建构提供逻辑支持,前者强调当公司濒临破产时董事对债权人直接承担信义义务,后者则认为此时董事依然对公司整体承担信义义务,但是应在决策中重点考量债权人利益。从我国公司治理实践来看,也有推进该制度立法建构的现实需求,包括平衡认缴资本制对法定资本规则的弱化、弥补破产程序启动规制的不足、顺应董事会中心主义治理模式的发展以及填补公司法与破产法之间的制度缝隙等。无论是德国和奥地利对该制度的明确规定,还是美国的"加深破产理论"与英国的"不当交易条款"等功能性替代规定,都能够为我国的立法提供参考。就具体的本土方案而言,可以"直接义务论"为指引,将该制度嵌入破产法体系之中。同时,围绕董事破产申请义务触发条件的界定、董事破产申请义务启动主体构成边界的明晰、董事破产申请义务限制期限的规制、董事破产申请义务中重整程序的融入、董事违反破产申请义务的责任承担以及董事违反破产申请义务的债权人追诉机制等相关内容,建构系统化的具体规则。
Legislative Construction on Directors'Duty of Filing for Insolvency on the Verge of Company Insolvency
When a company has lost or is about to lose its solvency on the verge of its insolvency,the operating risks are likely to be transferred from the shareholders to the creditors.The company directors'duty of filing for insolvency is an important measure to help the creditors cope with the above risks,because this system can effectively curb the internal opportunistic behaviors of shareholders,directors and creditors and prevent the continuous loss of company assets.In theory,both"direct duty theory"and"indirect duty theory"can provide logical support for its legislative construction.The former emphasizes that company directors bear direct fiduciary duty to creditors on the verge of company insolvency,while the latter holds that company directors should still bear overall fiduciary duty to the company but should focus on the interests of creditors in decision-making.From the perspective of corporate governance prac-tice in China,there are also practical needs to promote the legislation of this system,including balancing the weakening of the subscribed capital contribution system to the statutory capital rules,making up for the deficiencies of the regulation on the initiation of insolvency proceedings,conforming to the develop-ment of the governance model that centers on the board of directors,and bridging the institutional gap between the company law and the insolvency law,among others.Moreover,whether it is the explicit provisions of the system in Germany and Austria or the functional altemative provisions such as the"deepening insolvency theory"in the U.S.or the"wrongful trading clause"in the U.K.,they can provide references for the legislation in China.As for the specific case in China,it is suggested to take the"deep-ening insolvency theory"as the guide and embed it into the insolvency law system.In addition,a system-atic framework should be established to define the triggering conditions,clarify the boundaries of the subject initiating such process,regulate the restricted period,and integrate the restructuring procedure into the directors'duty of filing for insolvency.The framework should also cover the responsibilities of directors and the prosecuting mechanism of creditors if the directors violate their duty of filing for insol-vency.

China's Company Law of 2023on the verge of insolvencydirectorduty of filing for insolvencycorporate bankruptcy law

赵树文

展开 >

河北大学法学院,河北 保定071002

2023年《公司法》 濒临破产 董事 破产申请义务 企业破产法

国家社会科学基金项目

23BFX084

2024

学术论坛
广西社会科学院

学术论坛

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.633
ISSN:1004-4434
年,卷(期):2024.47(1)
  • 122