首页|农村集体经济组织成员资格认定的逻辑脉络及其展开

农村集体经济组织成员资格认定的逻辑脉络及其展开

扫码查看
农村集体经济组织成员资格认定是农村集体产权制度改革的基础性工作,集体所有权主体的确定是该问题研究的逻辑起点。集体所有权不具有共有和总有等所有权构造类型的特征,同时投资关系说和类比国有资本授权经营体制论都不能对农村集体经济组织的产生渊源进行合理解释。在民法规范语境下,应将农村集体经济组织确定为集体所有权主体。就成员资格和成员权利的关系而言,两者相伴而生,成员资格实质上是从权利主体角度对成员权的描述,为成员权在主体面向的表达。基于此,集体成员资格认定的法律实质是对农民所享有的集体经济组织成员权予以确权。我国农村传统经营方式决定了农户是基本经营单位,从逻辑上应当将家庭成员与以家庭为单位取得权益的关系确定为按份共有,集体经济组织成员权主体应为集体经济组织成员而非农户。城乡二元体制导致户籍这一本质上与成员权利取得不具因果关系的因素被纳入认定标准之中,其证明作用不应被忽视。在传统路径下,应构建以出生事实为核心、其他亲缘关系为辅助的主体判断路径,同时明确列举其他除外情形,形成正反双向的认定机制。在农村集体产权制度改革背景下,基于股权类型设置,集体固有成员与股份经济合作社股东在范围上并非完全一致,未来应以恢复农村集体经济组织和集体成员权的私法属性为目标,分阶段对农村集体经济组织成员权制度进行渐进性改革。
Logic Framework of Membership Recognition in Rural Collective Economic Organizations and Its Expansion
The recognition of membership qualification in rural collective economic organizations is fundamental to the reform of the rural collective property rights system,and the determination of the subject of collective ownership is the logical starting point for this issue.Collective ownership does not possess the characteristics of ownership structures such as joint ownership or common ownership.Furthermore,neither the investment relationship theory nor the analogy of the state-owned capital authori-zation system can provide a reasonable explanation for the origin of rural collective economic organiza-tions.Within the context of civil law,rural collective economic organizations should be identified as the subjects of collective ownership.Regarding the relationship between membership qualification and mem-bership right,they are interdependent and mutually constitutive.Membership qualification in essence describes the membership right from the perspective of the subject of right,serving as a recognition of membership right for the subjects.On this basis,the recognition of collective membership qualification is to legally confirm the membership right of farmers in such collective economic organizations.The tradi-tional operating modes in China's rural areas determine that rural households are the basic operating units.Logically,the relationship between family members and the rights and interests acquired on a household basis should be determined as co-ownership by share.The subjects of membership right in collective economic organizations should be members of the collective economic organizations rather than rural households.The urban-rural dual system has led to the inclusion of household registration,which is essen-tially unrelated to the acquisition of membership right,in the identification criteria.However,its eviden-tiary role should not be ignored.Under the traditional approach,it should establish a path to identify the subjects based mainly on birth as well as other kinship relationships,and other exceptional circumstances should be clearly listed so as to establish both forward and reverse recognition mechanisms.Against the backdrop of the reform of the rural collective property rights system and based on different types of stock equity,inherent members of collective organizations and shareholders of joint-stock economic coopera-tives may not be the same.In the future,the aim should be to restore the private law attributes of rural collective economic organizations and collective membership rights and to reform in phases the member-ship right system in rural collective economic organizations.

membership recognitionfarmer collectiverural collective property rights systemrural collective economic organizationjoint-stock economic cooperativemembership right

林广会、邹建永

展开 >

烟台大学法学院

烟台大学民事实体法与程序法交叉研究院,山东 烟台 264003

烟台南山学院智能科学与工程学院,山东烟台 265713

成员资格认定 农民集体 农村集体产权制度 农村集体经济组织 股份经济合作社 成员权

2024

学术论坛
广西社会科学院

学术论坛

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.633
ISSN:1004-4434
年,卷(期):2024.47(3)