首页|现场与在线:污染源监测数据的效力定位与制度选择

现场与在线:污染源监测数据的效力定位与制度选择

扫码查看
依托污染源监管手段的变革,在线监测数据正逐渐彰显出其在环境行政执法中的应用潜力。在学界,污染源监测数据效力定位存在"现场数据优先说""部门认定有效说""共同构成证据链说"等主流观点。在实务界,基于对污染源在线监测数据不同效力认定下的立案流程观察,发现存在以"需经现场监测数据佐证"为要件的"孤证不立"模式和以"需经环境主管部门审核"为要件的"孤证缓立"模式。从立案扩展至检查、调查、处罚等完整执法程序的进一步考察,能够搭建将在线监测数据作为立案辅助线索与决定依据的两种执法程序构造:"非现场检查+现场检查"型、"非现场检查+现场调查"型,对其展开制度比较发现,"应将污染源在线监测数据作为立案决定依据"乃是更加贴合我国国情的合理立论。依此见解,结合行政信赖保护、阶段审查标准、制度资源节约等维度,可为该项立论提供全面且坚实的法理支撑。在相应制度选择上,宜通过法定行政检查中现场与在线的二元监测结构、容纳在线监测数据在立案环节中的孤证效力、明确经非现场检查后应实施调查而非现场检查、重视相对人在行政处罚中的陈述与申辩权利等措施,推动污染源在线监测数据"孤证即立"的执法程序运用。
On-site Versus Off-site:Validity Positioning and Institutional Options for Pollution Source Monitoring Data
Relying on the transformations in the pollution source supervision methods,off-site moni-toring data are gradually showing their application potentials in the environmental administrative law enforcement.In the academia,there are three mainstream views on the validity positioning of pollution source monitoring data:giving priority to on-site data,validity upon departmental identification,and a chain of evidence consisting of multiple evidence.In the practice,based on the observations on the case filing process under different validity identification of off-site monitoring data of pollution sources,it is found that there is the model of"no filing based on single evidence"with a requirement of on-site monitoring data as further evidence and a model of"delayed filing based on single evidence"with a requirement of review and approval by the environmental competent department.Further investigation on the complete law enforcement procedures from case filing to inspection,investigation,and punishment show that there are two law enforcement procedure models with off-site monitoring data as auxiliary clues and decision basis for case filing:the"off-site inspection+on-site inspection"model,and the"off-site inspection+on-site investigation"model.After the comparisons of two models,the model featuring"off-site monitoring data of pollution sources as the decision basis for case filing"conforms better to the national conditions in China.Based on this view,combined with the perspectives of administrative trust protection,stage review criteria,and institutional resource conservation,it can provide comprehensive and solid legal support for the above argument.In terms of corresponding system selection,it is advisable to promote the use of the law enforcement procedure of"case filing based on single evidence"for off-site monitoring data of pollution sources through diverse measures such as dual monitoring structure of on-site inspection and off-site monitoring in statutory administrative inspections,recognizing the validity of single evidence of off-site monitoring data in the case filing process,clarifying that investigation rather than on-site inspection should be carried out after off-site inspections,and attaching importance to the rights of the party concerned for defense and pleading in the administrative penalties.

off-site monitoring dataoff-site inspectionon-site inspectionadministrative case filingevidentiary validity

何伦凤、朱谦

展开 >

苏州大学王健法学院,江苏 苏州 215006

在线监测数据 非现场检查 现场检查 行政立案 证据效力

2024

学术论坛
广西社会科学院

学术论坛

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.633
ISSN:1004-4434
年,卷(期):2024.47(5)