首页|社交媒体用户信息核查的平台类型差异:媒介丰富性的视角

社交媒体用户信息核查的平台类型差异:媒介丰富性的视角

扫码查看
虚假信息在社交媒体的泛滥已成为传媒行业的一大挑战,使得事实核查工作变得日益艰难。本研究基于媒介丰富性理论,探讨了用户在两种社交媒体平台上进行信息核查行为的差异。通过一项全国性的在线调查(N=2000),结果验证了研究假设。研究显示,文图为主类的社交媒体信息接触能够直接影响用户的信息核查行为,而视频为主的平台则通过提高信息可信度间接影响用户的信息核查行为。这表明,文图为主类的社交媒体较低的媒介丰富性可能促使用户更加主动地进行信息核查。相反,视频为主的平台由于其高媒介丰富性,能够增强信息的可信度,使得用户更倾向于认为这些信息是可信的,而后再进一步核查。本研究的发现为提升事实核查、信息核查,以及治理虚假信息提供了重要的实践启示。
The Differences in User Information Verification on Social Media Platforms:A Perspective of Media Richness
The proliferation of misinformation on social media has become a major challenge in the media industry,making fact-checking increasingly difficult.This study,based on the theory of media richness,explores the differences in information verification behavior among users on two types of social media platforms.The study verified the research hypotheses through a nationwide online survey(N=2000).The results show that exposure to text-and-image-based social media can directly affect information verification behavior,while video-based platforms indirectly influence users'information verification behavior by enhancing the credibility of information.This suggests that the lower media richness of text-and-image-based social media may prompt users to be more proactive in information verification.In contrast,video-based platforms,due to their high media richness,can enhance the credibility of information,making users more inclined to believe that the information is credible and further verify it.The findings of this study provide important practical insights for improving fact-checking,information verification,and the governance of misinformation.

fact-checkinginformation verificationsocial mediamedia richnessonline information credibility

孙梦如、吴飞

展开 >

浙江大学传媒与国际文化学院,浙江杭州310058

浙江大学国际传播研究中心,浙江杭州310058

事实核查 信息核查 社交媒体 媒介丰富性 网络信息可信度

2024

新闻界
四川日报报业集团

新闻界

CSSCI北大核心
影响因子:0.567
ISSN:1007-2438
年,卷(期):2024.(10)