首页|AI作为孕育机器:出生、母体与创伤

AI作为孕育机器:出生、母体与创伤

扫码查看
出生与死亡都是与人的有限性相关的根本哲学问题,但在西方哲学史上,前者却向来为人忽视.在近来的两部关于出生的专著之中,奥博恩和伊利格瑞分别从不同的角度对出生进行了深入思考,由此呈现出三条不同的线索.第一是在海德格尔的《存在与时间》中阐释的无根基性,第二是生命哲学对此所做出的积极回应,第三是伊利格瑞从"间隙"这个古希腊哲学概念所生发出的间隙本体论.出生作为绝对偶然的事件,作为生生不息的创造,作为与母体之间的间距,这三种思路都进一步体现于近来愈发火热的人造生命的研究之中.虽然人造生命重释和发展了"生命作为根基"这个前提,但它也面临着预制生命这个危险的未来.重新激活出生创伤这个内在体验,可能是唤醒主体性的途径.
AI as Machine of Birth:Birth,Maternal Body and Trauma
Birth and death are both fundamental philosophical issues related to human finitude,but in the history of Western philosophy,the former has always been ignored.In two recent monographs,O'Byrne and Irigaray have respectively conducted in-depth thinking on natality from different perspectives,thus presenting three different clues.The first is the groundlessness explained in Heidegger's Being and Time,the second is the positive response of the philosophy of life to this,and the third is Irigaray's interval ontology derived from the ancient Greek philosophy.The idea that birth is an absolutely accidental event,a creative becoming,and an interval between maternal bodies is further reflected in the recent increasingly hot researches on artificial life.Although artificial life reinterprets and develops the premise of"life as the foundation",it also faces the dangerous future of prefabricated life.Reactivating the inner experience of birth trauma may be a possible way to awaken subjectivity.

birthgroundlessnessintervalmaternal bodyartificial life

姜宇辉

展开 >

华东师范大学政治与国际关系学院(上海 200062)

出生 去根基 间隙 母体 人造生命

国家社会科学基金

21BWW012

2024

新文科教育研究

新文科教育研究

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 70