首页|环境风险治理的制度化与"制度化自反"

环境风险治理的制度化与"制度化自反"

扫码查看
制度化是环境风险治理的有效路径,但制度化也会因为"制度化自反"而成为新的环境风险源.环境风险治理制度化体现在认知理性化、行为规范化和组织系统化等方面,获得了科学认知并开展有序的治理行动.但面对高度复杂性和高速流动性的环境风险时,制度化路径失效了,反而在应用中出现制度化的自反,制度化的路径成了新的环境风险的根源.环境风险治理中制度化自反表现为:风险认知理性化引发风险认知偏见,参与程式化带来民主形式化,组织规范运行却出现异化.总体来看,环境风险治理需要从制度主义转向行动主义,在行动主义框架下消除制度化的自反.具体来说,需要确立合作行动的治理理念,健全风险治理规则,构建合作行动组织体系,优化技术治理工具.
The Institutionalization of Environmental Risk Governance and"Institutional Self-reflection"
Institutionalization is an effective approach to environmental risk governance,but it can also become a new source of environmental risks due to"institutional self-reflection".The institutionalization of environmental risk governance is reflected in aspects such as cognitive rationalization,behavioral standardization,and organizational systematization,which have gained scientific understanding and conducted orderly governance actions.However,when facing highly complex and rapidly changing environmental risks,the institutionalization approach may fail and instead lead to institutional self-reflection,becoming a new source of environmental risks.Institutional self-reflection in environmental risk governance manifests as cognitive biases arising from rationalized risk perception,formalization resulting from procedural participation,and organizational alienation despite normative operations.Overall,environmental risk governance needs to shift from institutionalism to activism to eliminate institutional self-reflection within an activism framework.Specifically,it is necessary to establish a governance philosophy based on collaborative actions,improve risk governance rules,build collaborative action organizational systems,and optimize technological governance tools.

environmental risk governanceinstitutionalization"institutional self-reflection"

向玉琼、李清

展开 >

南京农业大学公共管理学院

环境风险治理 制度化 "制度化自反"

南京市社会科学基金

23YB10

2024

行政与法
吉林省行政学院

行政与法

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.338
ISSN:1007-8207
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 1
  • 23