Analysis of Innovative Practices of Social Contradiction Resolution at the Grassroots Level——An Examination Based on Three Typical Cases
Grass-roots governance is the cornerstone of national governance,and resolving grass-roots social con-flicts is the key to maintaining national stability.Grassroots social needs,shortcomings in contradiction management,and the supply of national systems have jointly driven the exploration of innovative practices for resolving social conflicts at the grassroots level,resulting in the emergence of Sichuan's"source of complaints management",Zhejiang's"spear mediation center",and Shaanxi's"two say,one link"as examples of innovative practices,and their impact on improving the quality and effectiveness of conflict resolution and forming a pattern of shared governance.As a result,Sichuan's"source governance",Zhejiang's"spear mediation centers",and Shaanxi's"two statements and one association"have become models of innovative practices,and have achieved remarkable results in improving the quality of conflict resolution,forming a pattern of common governance and sharing,and setting up a brand experience.Through the examination of these three local cases,it is found that China's grassroots experience has not only theoretically enriched the connotations of the new public service theory,the agile governance theory,and the social conflict theory,but has also provided a model for reference and promotion in practice:the"source of complaint governance"builds a perception mechanism for tracing back to the source and preventing conflicts in the first place,The"spear-adjustment center"builds a flexible mechanism of departmental integration and functional collaboration,and the"two statements and one link"creates a response mechanism of collective mobilization and subjective coordination,as well as a fusion of the three mechanisms from a holistic perspective,all of which have brought excellent experience in resolving social conflicts at the grass-roots level.
grassroots social conflict resolutioninnovative practicetypical casespractical value