首页|结合DCE-MRI对比经外科脱位入路联合打压植骨术与带血管蒂髂骨瓣转移术治疗ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头坏死的临床疗效

结合DCE-MRI对比经外科脱位入路联合打压植骨术与带血管蒂髂骨瓣转移术治疗ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头坏死的临床疗效

扫码查看
目的:通过对病例的回顾性分析,结合动态增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)技术,对比经外科脱位入路(SHD)联合打压植骨术(IBG)与带血管蒂髂骨瓣转移术(PVIBGT)两种不同术式治疗ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头坏死的疗效.方法:选取江苏省中医院2012年1月—2022年7月收治的ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头坏死患者30例,根据治疗方法的不同分成A组(SHD-IBG治疗)和B组(PVIBGT治疗).基于髋关节Harris评分、影像学资料,对比分析两组的远期疗效,并采用DCE-MRI技术分析两组术后2年股骨头内微循环的变化.结果:术后2年,A组保髋成功率为93.3%,B组保髋成功率为86.7%.两组术后1年平均髋关节Harris评分均较术前明显提高,A组术前平均髋关节Harris评分69.5分,术后1年平均髋关节Harris评分81.5分,术后2年平均髋关节Harris评分73.6分;B组术前平均髋关节Harris评分70.7分,术后1年平均髋关节Harris评分78.9分,术后2年平均髋关节Harris评分72.5分.两组患者术后1年及术后2年平均髋关节Harris评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).采用DCE-MRI技术分析可知,与术前相比,术后2年两组股骨头坏死区血流灌注均增加,修复反应区高灌注情况均改善.结论:结合DCE-MRI技术,通过对比分析SHD-IBG与PVIBGT治疗ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头坏死的远期疗效,发现两种术式均能延缓股骨头坏死的进展,其中SHD-IBG的临床疗效更佳.
Comparison of clinical efficacy between SHD-IBG and PVIBGT in the treatment of ARCO stage Ⅲ ONFH combined with DCE-MRI technology
Objective:Combined with DCE-MRI technology,to compare SHD-IBG with PVIBGT in the treatment of ARCO stage Ⅲ ONFH.Methods:30 patients with ARCO stage III ONFH admitted to Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2012 to July 2022 were selected and divided into group A(SHD-IBG)and group B(PVIBGT)according to different treatment methods.Based on Harris score and imaging data,the long-term efficacy of the two groups was compared and analyzed,and DCE-MRI technology was used to analyze the changes in microcirculation in the femoral head of the two groups 2 years after surgery.Results:Two years after surgery,the hip preservation rate was 93.3%in group A and 86.7%in group B.The average Harris score in both groups increased significantly 1 year after surgery compared to before surgery.The average Harris score in group A was 69.5 points before surgery,81.5 points 1 year after surgery,and 73.6 points 2 years after surgery.The average Harris score in group B was 70.7 points before surgery,78.9 points 1 year after surgery,and 72.5 points 2 years after surgery.There was a statistically significant difference(P<0.05)in the average Harris scores between the two groups of patients at 1 and 2 years after surgery.DCE-MRI analysis showed that,compared with preoperative results,the blood flow perfusion in the femoral head necrosis area increased in both groups 2 years after surgery,and the high perfusion in the repair reaction area improved.Conclusion:By combining DCE-MRI technology and comparing the long-term efficacy of SHD-IBG and PVIBGT in treating ARCO stage III ONFH,it is found that both surgical procedures can delay the progression of femoral head necrosis,and the clinical effect of SHD-IBG is better than PVIBGT.

Surgical dislocationPercutaneous bone graftingTransfer of vascularized iliac bone flapARCO stage Ⅲ femoral headrosisDynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

权力、孙家豪、夏天卫、沈计荣

展开 >

南京中医药大学附属医院(江苏省中医院),江苏 南京 210029

外科脱位 打压植骨术 带血管蒂髂骨瓣转移术 ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头坏死 动态增强磁共振成像

2024

延边大学医学学报
延边大学

延边大学医学学报

影响因子:0.308
ISSN:1000-1824
年,卷(期):2024.47(4)