首页|晏殊词论三条材料之辨

晏殊词论三条材料之辨

扫码查看
刘攽在《中山诗话》中认为,晏殊词与冯延巳词一样具有可歌性,而不是晏殊词继承冯延巳词风格;晁无咎《评本朝乐章》中晏元献一句出现晏几道的词句,当确为评论晏殊而非晏几道,只是其后的词句将晏几道词误记为晏殊词;李清照《词论》中批评晏殊词有“以诗为词”和“不协音律”两项,前一项已确证,而后一项可能事实并非如此。
Analysis on Three Pieces of Critiques on Yan Shu’ s Poetry
The paper analyzes three pieces of critiques on Yan Shu ’ s poetry.Liu Ban’ s remark in Zhong Shan Poetry that Yan’ s poetry was adaptable to songs just as that of Feng yansi ’ s did not mean that his poetry was an inheritance to Feng yansi ’ s style;Yao Wujiu quoted a line from Yan Jidao ’ s poem in his criticism of Yan Shu ’ s poetry in Critiques on Contemporary Movements.This must be a mistake made by the critic himself where he confused Yan Shu ’ s poem with Yan Jidao ’ s.Li Qingzhao , in her Critiques on Song Poems, said that Yan Shu“wrote Song poetry in Tang style and failed to represent rhythmical beauty”, while the first remark stood to rea-son, the second one was not exactly the case .

Yan ShuCritiques on Song PoemsCritiques on Contemporary MovementsCritiques on Song Po-emsanalysis

张中秀、邓雷

展开 >

东华理工大学 文法学院,江西 南昌 330013

晏殊 《中山诗话》 《评本朝乐章》 《词论》 辨析

2014

宜宾学院学报
宜宾学院

宜宾学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.185
ISSN:1671-5365
年,卷(期):2014.(4)
  • 23