重估"反对阐释"的理论效力
Reassessing the Theoretical Effectiveness of"Against Interpretation"
万博轩1
作者信息
- 1. 暨南大学文学院,广东广州 510632
- 折叠
摘要
苏珊·桑塔格的"反对阐释"融合了批判与建构两种艺术批评取向,试图在文化保守主义盛行的状况下寻求艺术批评的突围.从思想基础看,桑塔格对艺术本体的理解源于现象学,其理论发展则受到反传统形而上学、反理论主义的影响,同时以强烈的现实关切为导向.然而,桑塔格过分信赖现象学还原,忽略了艺术批评的相对独立性.虽然"反对阐释"之说能够促进艺术的多元发展,有助于形成新的审美空间与话语机制.但其在理论立场上较为激进,对其他文化不够宽容,同时其对审美解放的承诺亦显得理想化.要在"反对阐释"之后开创一条阐释的新路,需要在当代西方文论的阐释理论之外建构一种当代中国阐释学.
Abstract
Susan Sontag's"gainst Interpretation"combines the two orientations of art criticism,criticism and construction.She tries to seek a breakthrough under the condition that cultural conservatism prevails.In terms of its ideological basis,Sontag's understanding of the essence of art comes from phenomenology,and her theo-retical development is influenced by the tendency of againsting traditional metaphysics and anti-theoreticism.Meanwhile,Sontag's theoretical development is oriented by her realistic concerns.However,Sontag relies too much on phenomenological reduction,ignores the relative independence of art criticism.Although the theory of"against interpretation"can promote the diversified development of art and contribute to form a new aes-thetic space and discourse mechanism,its theoretical stance is relatively radical,and it is not tolerant enough to other cultures.At the same time,its promise of aesthetic liberation is also too ideal.In order to create a new way of interpretation after"against interpretation",it is necessary to invent a Chinese hermeneutics outside the interpretation theory of contemporary Western literary theory.
关键词
苏珊·桑塔格/"反对阐释"/艺术批评Key words
Susan Sontag/"against interpretation"/art criticism引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据