首页|行业垄断及创业活跃度对共同富裕的影响研究

行业垄断及创业活跃度对共同富裕的影响研究

扫码查看
从共同富裕的发展性、共享性与可持续性三方面构建共同富裕指数,利用2008-2020年省际面板数据与A股上市公司企业数据进行匹配,建立固定效应模型和门槛效应模型解释垄断程度对共同富裕的影响,并对创业活跃度进行中介效应、调节效应分析.研究表明:垄断对共同富裕具有显著的抑制效应并且存在非线性特征,创业活跃度在其中充当着中介变量,起调节作用;异质性研究发现行业垄断对于共同富裕的抑制效应"数字经济领域>民生领域>资本市场领域";通过将垄断程度数据滞后一期、用主成分分析方法重新测算共同富裕指数、进行缩尾处理以及剔除直辖市等稳健性检验结论依然成立.因此,垄断会阻碍共同富裕的实现,需要通过反垄断法来促进市场公平竞争,制定差异化、层次化的反垄断措施,鼓励"大众创业,万众创新".
Research on the Impact of Industry Monopoly and Entrepreneurial Activity on Common Prosperity
The common wealth index is constructed from the three aspects of development,sharing and sus-tainability of common wealth,using the inter-provincial panel data from 2008 to 2020 to match with the enter-prise data of A-share listed companies,establishing the fixed effect model and the threshold effect model to explain the influence of monopoly on common wealth,and analyzing the mediating and moderating effects of entrepreneurial activity.The study shows that:monopoly has a significant inhibitory effect on the common wealth and there are non-linear characteristics,entrepreneurial activity acts as an intermediary variable and plays a moderating role;heterogeneity study finds that the inhibitory effect of industry monopoly on the com-mon wealth is"digital economy>livelihood>capital market".By lagging the monopoly data by one period,re-measuring the common wealth index by principal component analysis,shrinking the tails,and excluding municipalities,the robustness test conclusion still holds.Therefore,monopoly will hinder the realization of common wealth,and it is necessary to promote fair competition in t he market through the anti-monopoly law,formulate differentiated and hierarchical anti-monopoly measures,and encourage"mass entrepreneurship and innovation".

degree of monopolycommon prosperityentrepreneurial activitythreshold effect

廖湘岳、伍侯成

展开 >

湖南科技大学商学院,湖南湘潭 411201

垄断程度 共同富裕 创业活跃度 门槛效应

2024

宜宾学院学报
宜宾学院

宜宾学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.185
ISSN:1671-5365
年,卷(期):2024.24(9)