首页|程序法视野下网络暴力型侮辱诽谤案件的追诉路径

程序法视野下网络暴力型侮辱诽谤案件的追诉路径

扫码查看
与传统侮辱诽谤案件相比,网络暴力型侮辱诽谤案件具有网络在线性、分散化、软暴力的特点,仅仅依靠被害人有限的取证能力难以支撑惩罚犯罪目的的实现.尽管我国已针对网络暴力犯罪的追诉出台了相应规定,但不能从根本上解决被害人追诉能力不足与案件取证困难之间的矛盾.亲告罪严格自诉的规定混淆了公诉与自诉、自诉与亲告罪的关系,该规定不仅缺乏学理上的支撑,也使得实践中的被害人追诉困难重重,不利于权益保障.因此,打破亲告罪中公诉与自诉的壁垒,赋予被害人完全的告诉权能,重构公自诉并行的二元追诉机制,方可畅通网络暴力型侮辱诽谤案件的追诉通路,实现惩罚犯罪与保障人权的平衡.
Prosecution Path of Online Violent Insult and Defamation Cases from Perspec-tive of Procedural Law
Compared with traditional insult and defamation cases,online violent insult and defamation cases have the characteristics of linear,decentralized,and soft violence in the network.Relying solely on the limited evidence collection ability of the victim is difficult to support the achievement of the purpose of punishing the crime.Although China has introduced corresponding regulations for the prosecution of cybercrime,it cannot fundamentally solve the contradiction between the insufficient ability of victims to prosecute and the difficulty of obtaining evidence in cases.The strict regulation of private prosecution for the crime of confession confuses the relationship between public prosecution and private prosecution,and between private prosecution and the crime of confession.This regulation not only lacks theoretical support,but also makes it difficult for victims to prosecute in practice,which is not conducive to the protection of their rights and interests.Breaking down the barriers between public prosecution and private prosecution in the crime of personal prosecution,granting vic-tims full right to tell,and reconstructing the dual prosecution mechanism of public and private prosecution in parallel,can smooth the prosecution path of online violent insult and defamation cases,and achieve a balance between punishing crimes and protecting human rights.

cyber bullyingacceptance at complaint onlytransition from private prosecution to public prosecu-tion

刘润宇

展开 >

北京师范大学法学院,北京 100875

网络暴力 告诉才处理 自诉转公诉

2024

宜宾学院学报
宜宾学院

宜宾学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.185
ISSN:1671-5365
年,卷(期):2024.24(10)