Objective:comparative analysis of two methods in treatment of cholelithiasis. Methods:35 cases of cholelithiasis patients will be in 2013 February- 2014 year in February my courtyard to take laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of as study group, 35 cases of gal stone patients from 2013 February to come to this in our hospital adopts the traditional open cholecystectomy as control group based on the comparative analysis of two groups of patients, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, complication the in-cidence and duration of hospitalization. Results:the study group of patients with operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, the in-cidence of complications and hospitalization time were 47.9+10.2min, 98.6+7.9ml, 2+1n, 4.6+1.9d, patients in the control group, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, the incidence of complications and hospitalization time were 75.8+12.1min, 138.8 +21.5ml, 7 +2n, 10.3+2.9d, obviously, the differences between groups was statistically significant, P<0.05. Conclusion:through re-search and analysis, compared with traditional open resection of gallbladder, using laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of cholelithiasis, attains the effect more obvious and good, not only can shorten the operation time and hospitalization time, and also can reduce the occurrence of bleeding and complications during operation, it is worth for clinical application, and to promote.
laparoscopic cholecystectomyclinicalCholelithiasistraditional open cholecystectomy
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
