首页|年轻原发性慢性闭角型青光眼周边虹膜切除术与小梁切除术的疗效比较

年轻原发性慢性闭角型青光眼周边虹膜切除术与小梁切除术的疗效比较

Comparison of peripheral iridectomy and trabeculectomy in younger patients with chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma

扫码查看
目的 比较周边虹膜切除术(surgical peripheral iridectomy,SPI)与小梁切除术(trabeculectomy,Trab)治疗进展期和晚期年轻原发性慢性闭角型青光眼(chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma,CPACG)的疗效与安全性.设计 回顾性比较性病例系列.研究对象 2012年1月至2022年12月首次在中山大学中山眼科中心行Trab或SPI、年龄≤40岁的进展期或晚期CPACG连续病例48例(67眼).方法 按手术方式分为Trab组与SPI组,其中Trab组15例(22眼),SPI组33例(45眼).记录视力、Goldmann眼压、影像学及视野检查的结果,比较两组手术成功率及手术并发症发生率、术前与术后的眼部参数情况.主要指标 最佳矫正视力、眼压、中央前房深度、降眼压药物种类、房角开放距离、前房夹角、手术成功率.结果 48例CPACG患者中位数年龄为32.0(24.3,36.0)岁.Trab组术后平均随访19.6±22.2月;SPI组术后平均随访39.1±20.9个月.Trab组手术成功率为45.5%(10/22眼);SPI组手术成功率80.0%(36/45眼).SPI组的手术成功率高于Trab组(x2=15.528,P<0.001).Trab组与SPI组的术前最佳矫正视力、眼压、中央前房深度、降眼压药物种类无统计学差异,而Trab组的房角开放距离和前房夹角较SPI组小(Z=-2.174,P=0.030;Z=-2.107,P=0.035).末次随访时,与Trab组相比,SPI组最佳矫正视力较好(Z=-2.310,P=0.021)、中央前房深度较深(Z=-4.615,P<0.001)、房角开放距离与前房夹角较大(均Z=-3.924,P<0.001),而眼压较高(Z=-2.455,P=0.014)、降眼压药物种类较多(Z=-5.721,P<0.001).Trab组术后并发症发生率59.1%(13/22眼),包括浅前房11眼,恶性青光眼2眼;SPI组术后并发症发生率6.7%(3/45眼),均为伤口渗漏;Trab组的术后并发症发生率高于SPI组(P<0.001).结论 ≤40岁CPACG患者行Trab手术成功率较低且手术并发症较多;SPI联合降眼压药物治疗成功率较高且手术并发症较少.对≤40岁的CPACG患者即使是进展期或晚期患者,首次手术可以考虑选择SPI.(眼科,2024,33:261-266)
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical peripheral iridectomy and trabeculectomy for young patients with chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma(CPACG).Design Retrospective comparative case series.Participants Consecutive cases of intermediate and advanced-staged CPACG,aged 40 years or younger,who underwent either trabeculectomy(Trab)or surgical periph-eral iridectomy(SPI)as an initial treatment at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center between January 2012 and December 2022 were enrolled,including 48 patients(67 eyes).Methods The patients were divided into two groups:the Trab group and the SPI group.There were 15 cases(22 eyes)in Trab group and 33 cases(45 eyes)in SPI group.The results of ocular examinations were recorded,including visual acuity,intraocular pressure(IOP),slit-lamp microscopy,fundus examination,gonioscopy,A-scan ultrasonography,ultrasound biomicroscopy,spectral domain optical coherence tomography,and visual field test.Ocular parameters before and after the operation,success rate and incidence of complication were compared between groups.Main Outcome Measures Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),IOP,anteri-or chamber depth(ACD),the number of glaucoma medications,the angle opening distance 500 μm from the scleral spur(AOD500),an-terior chamber angle(ACA)and surgical success rate.Results A total of 48 PACG patients(67 eyes)were enrolled,including 10 males and 38 females.The median age was 32.0(24.3-36.0)years old.The mean duration of follow up for Trab group and SPI group was 19.6±22.2 months and 39.1±20.9 months,respectively.The success rate of Trab group was 45.5%(10/22).The success rate of SPI group was 80.0%(36/45),which was higher than that of Trab group(x2=15.528,P<0.001).No difference was found in BCVA,IOP,ACD and the number of glaucoma medications between Trab group and SPI group before surgery,and AOD500 and ACA were wider in SPI group(Z=-2.174,P=0.030;and Z=-2.107,P=0.035).At the last visit,BCVA was better(Z=-2.310,P=0.021),ACD was deeper(Z=-4.615,P<0.001),AOD500 and ACA was wider(both Z=-3.924,P<0.001),the IOP was higher(Z=-2.455,P=0.014)and the number of glaucoma medications was more(Z=-5.721,P<0.001)in SPI group than that in Trab group.The postoperative complications in Trab group con-sisted of shallow anterior chamber(11 eyes)and malignant glaucoma(2 eyes),with an incidence of 59.1%(13/22).While in SPI group,the rate of postoperative complications was 6.7%(3/45 cases of wound leakage),which was much lower than that of Trab group(P<0.001).Conclusion The success rate is lower for trabeculectomy with more complications in young CPACG patients,while the success rate is higher for SPI plus antiglaucoma medications with fewer complications.SPI is more effective and safer than Trab as an initial treatment for young patients with intermediate and advanced-staged CPACG.(Ophthalmol CHN,2024,33:261-266)

angle-closure glaucomatrabeculectomyperipheral iridectomy

林树芬、苏毅华、钟毅敏、肖辉、朱颖婷、方蕾、陈立明、刘杏

展开 >

中山大学中山眼科中心眼病防治全国重点实验室广东省眼科视觉科学重点实验室广东省眼部疾病临床医学研究中心,广州 510060

中山大学附属第一医院眼科,广州 510080

闭角型青光眼 小梁切除术 周边虹膜切除术

广东省自然科学基金广东省医学科学技术研究基金

2022A151501146920201127141137226

2024

眼科
中日友好医院,北京同仁医院,北京市眼科研究所

眼科

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.483
ISSN:1004-4469
年,卷(期):2024.33(4)
  • 5